帮小弟看看这个题目的思路。。拿不准。谢谢了

gchao1109

110. “Allpersonnel evaluations at a company should be multi-directional — that is,people at every level of the organization should review not only those working‘under’ them but also those working ‘over’ them.”
Discussthe extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above.Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience,observations, or reading.
“一个公司里所有的个人评价都应该是多方面的，即组织内各个层面的人员不但应该评价他们的下属也应该评价他们的上司。” ````````````````````


求思路。。。。
谢谢了。。。

lifanscut

新人见解，仅供交流
Above all, the author contends that multi-directional evaluations can be justified as the combination of the employee's superior and subordinate. This is, however, virtually unwarranted because the very combination stated is just one profile of the definition. Multi-directional evaluations can also incorporate the integrated evaluations that owns many other factors, such as working achievements, rates of absenteeism and interpersonal relationships, etc.(Ellipsis)
Second, the definition that multi-directional evaluations can be regarded as the overall evaluations of one's superior and subordinate is somehow unfeasible. A simple instance is that the boss or the boarders, who have no superior above, can never receive evaluations from the people working "above" them. Nor can the employee in the lowest hierarchy receive evaluations from the people working "under" them. This unfeasibility presents insurmountable obstacle for the application of the definition.