悬赏 是OG12出错了吗？大家都来看看吧，一个百思不得其解的OG解释~

jenny0827

OG12-101 Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.（全划线）

1、Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

2、An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.

3、An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.

4、Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.

5、Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

B选项中OG说：the modifier when they do appear is misplaced.

对比B和正确选项E，时间状语从句when they do appear都放在misinterpret them (B为misinterpreting ones)后面，说likely放错还差不多；

另外，C里面把miss和misinterpret并列起来作为signs的谓语，本应该修饰misinterpret的when they do appear变成修饰miss和misinterpret，在这里说when they do appear放错位置还差不多。

总结到现在，偶窃以为给OG写SC解释的人有虎头蛇尾之嫌，越写越马虎，越简洁，他倒是简洁了，我们可就找不着北了~ 基于这一点，会不会有这样的可能性，when they do appear is misplaced应该放在C选项里呢？

查遍CD也没有关于这点的解释，本人已经在这题上耗了1个多小时，无尽痛苦，恳请闪烁着无尽智慧火花的CDers都来说说想法吧！

Christine瓜瓜

A:指代不明确,it指代的到底是什么?
B1)状语的位置不对,signs of...其实真正的被修饰词是signs,后接状语,中间不应该出现likely,且其用法错误,应该为be likely to的结构.
(2)or的平行结构,动词原形和动名词并列为错误,同样的错误也出现在D选项中.
(3)逻辑错误:根据句意,发生错误的原因是heavy commitment造成的,而不是executive造成的.
C:it的指代不明确.
D:所有格+being错误~

E:正确,主语正确,one的指代也正确,one在指代人的时候等于someone,在其之前不能出现被one指代的人称名词.而且说法也简洁,没有who is等的无意义词组的出现.

不知道我解释滴清楚不啦~大家积极讨论哪~

22464319

A makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear 中 when they do appear做them的宾语补足语 整个misinterpret~appear和 miss~trouble是并列的 B makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear可简化为 makes...like 而后面的 when they do appear就是修饰前面的missing & misinterpreting两件事了 而when they do appear的本意是只修饰misinterpret them
C 的情况和B差不多
E is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear可以简化为 is likely to make sb miss or misinterpret 这里面miss signs of incipient trouble 和 misinterpret them when they do appear 是并列的 所以when they do appear还是修饰misinterpret them中的them的
不知道分析的对不对 对于SC来说 我也是新手 呵呵

sheikh239

一般有歧义的指代优先考虑最近项,C中的they 应该是修饰的signs,而且逻辑上也只有signs才会appear

关于B的观点我赞同你

其实已经有那么多可排除的因素了,one啊it 啊 being啊

剩下的如果还有读起来感觉很不对的就可以归结为 rhetorical construction了

jenny0827

嗯，明白了，关于when they do appear这件事B和C的错误是差不多的，归根结底还是代词they的指代问题，谢谢大家哦！！！撒花~撒花~

YangC515

BEING能够在句首用么

sheikh239

OG12 新PREP里面有道题 (不知道OG10里面有没有)就是being开头的

如果想验证某个词的用法,可以用word文档的检索功能,查找所有的being


这样就非常清晰了

jenny0827

BEING能够在句首用么

-- by 会员 YangC515 (2010/8/20 11:20:39)

当然可以啊～千万不能听某机构说的being绝对错，当然OG里being错的例子很多，多半是因为being sth.的表达有点多余，还有别的更精简的方法可以表达（这点跟there be类似），但还是需要具体问题具体分析的哦，比如这题，用作动名词的被动态，是必须地～