ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2692|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Prep 1 -216

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-29 14:21:42 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
prep1-216,(T-3-Q39)
216.
(30280-!-item-!-188;#058&005378)(T-3-Q39.
???-7-39)











Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.





A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi,





B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi,





C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,





D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,





E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi,

the answer is C

原文的意思是
Plants are efficient and (are) converting ... 省略are吗?

还是Plants are more efficient at [acquiring ... and converting ...]
在获得和转换方面plants 比较efficient ?




原文的意思是
Plants are efficient and (are) converting ... 省略are吗?

还是Plants are more efficient at [acquiring ... and converting ...]
在获得和转换方面plants 比较efficient ?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-4-29 15:30:31 | 只看该作者
“Plants are more efficient at [acquiring ... and converting ...]
在获得和转换方面plants 比较efficient ”

支持这个说法~根据parallelism的原则, be V-ing..., and V-ing...
"are effecient..., and converting..."不符合这个原则,所以“converting”应该是和“acquiring”并行的~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-5 16:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部