ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1513|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助:还是which指代问题!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-2-8 12:42:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG12-107
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,a technique called proteon-induced X-ray emission,which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it,,is finding uses in medicne,archaelogy,and criminology.
答案是A,解释中finally,the nonrestrictive clause which...destriying it is correctly placed next to emission and set off from the rest of the sentence by a pair of commas.我理解就是which就近修饰emission
而C答案A technique orginally developed for detecting air pollutants,called proton-induced X-ray emission,which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it的解释却是relative clause introduced by which incorrectly and illogically modifies "emission"
C和A的which位置不是一样的吗,为什么C就错了呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-2-8 12:54:19 | 只看该作者
which不是修饰emission的吧,应该是修饰tecnique才说的过去。
板凳
发表于 2010-2-8 12:58:22 | 只看该作者
A中的a technique called proteon-induced X-ray emission里面中心语是a technique, 而called proteon-induced X-ray emission只是修饰作用的。which还是修饰technique的。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-2-8 13:23:54 | 只看该作者
谢谢,我也看过关于which指代的那篇向ETS求证的帖子,但是还是有点不清楚中心语是怎么确定的呢?特别是有of,for之类的词
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 13:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部