哪位牛人帮忙看看大作文吧...25号就考了,不胜感激呀!

mimosaxu88

There is a general discussion nowadays about how human being obtains their knowledge. Those who criticize that people gained more from practical experience argue that it is applying as well as direct. They believe that books can’t cover all the information we need, and also, the aim for people enlarging their academic knowledge is to utilize it in every aspects of life. However, people who advocate human being need to learn information in books, on the other hand, argue that materials in books are wider and profound.

It is true that knowledge from books is usually systemic, but it is unlikely that sometimes we find it very conservative and hard to control. Compared to the disadvantages it may have, I hold an opinion that we could only learn something very well through experience. If we just learn it from book, like the right poses to swim well, we should admit that without trying it, we cannot manage to swim as well. If we just read the book about how to drive perfectly, I suppose no one will be able to drive. These situations are not rare and they are just typical of dozens I have ever heard before.

Furthermore, to speak frankly, there is an appropriate example that is persuasive. Learning something from experience gains more opportunities for us to communicate with others. It will teach us not only to get along with other students, but also learn something superb from them. I have ever gained knowledge of playing piano with my friend Jane, who is a very capable person not only professional in her field, but have a lot of good personalities as well such as tolerance and understanding. She influenced me a lot on all these aspects. She used to be very strict with me when checking out my performance. And also, if I had anything in trouble, she would be the first one to help me. Just imagine without the experience to be trained by her, I would never have such a perfect chance to meet her. It is no better illustration that can demonstrate the view.

Finally, as a proverb says, “Each coin has two sides”, Examples from personal experience lead me to conclude that knowledge from books is usually systemic, which is excellent for learning something abstract. I can only study algebra calculus anthropology and philosophy in my test books, because they can hardly be described with experience logically. And also, I am fond of reading history books and geography maps, these kinds of knowledge, to some extent, are difficult to obtain from experience. In addition, great works are all published in books so that people can understand them well, such as the Darwinism and Marxism. They are undeniable profound and insight.

Taking into account all above factors, we can find out that despite all the advantages people get skilled from the books, learning from experience seems to be more interesting and practicing. But people cannot be logical and systemic without reading books. Therefore, from what I have discussed we have no alternative but to, keep in mind that only by combing knowledge from both on the books and in one’s experience, will a person be versatile in s/he’s field.

 

哪位大虾肯给点建议,谢谢啦!!

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-14 17:55:13编辑过]

德克的猪

你可以先参考该版置顶的帖子里边的修改集合

然后我在iBT区有一个写作的帖子，你也可以参考一下

然后发现自己的一些问题，进行修改过后再发上来

我进行具体的修改

mimosaxu88

谢谢德克...刚刚有拜读了你的大作....

修改作文中...

小猪3

我也25

mimosaxu88

加油加油

mimosaxu88

There is a general discussion recently about how human being obtains their knowledge. Those who criticize that people gained more from practical experience argue that it is applying as well as direct. They believe that books cannot cover all the information we need, and also, the aim for people magnifying their academic knowledge is to utilize it in every aspects of life. However, people who advocate human being need to learn information in books, on the other hand, argue that materials in books are wider and profound.

It is true that knowledge from books is usually systemic, but it is unlikely that sometimes we find it very conservative and hard to control. Compared to the drawbacks it may have, I prospect that we can only learn something very well through experience. If we barely discover it from book, like the prosper poses to swim well, we are supposed to acknowledge that without trying it, we cannot manage to swim as well. If we just read the book about how to drive perfectly, I suppose no one will be able to drive. These situations are not rare and they are quintessential of dozens I have ever heard before.

Furthermore, to speak frankly, there is an appropriate example that is persuasive. Learning something from experience gains more opportunities for us to communicate with others. It will teach us not only to get along with other students, but also learn something superb from them. I have ever gained knowledge of playing piano with my friend Jane, who is a tremendously capable person not only professional in her field, but have a lot of good personalities as well such as tolerance and understanding. She influenced me a lot on all these aspects. She used to be very strict with me when checking out my performances. And also, if I had anything in trouble, she would be the first one to help me. Just imagine without the experience to be trained by her, I would never have such a perfect chance to meet her. It is no better illustration that can demonstrate the view.

Eventually, as a proverb says, “Each coin has two sides”, Examples from personal experience lead me to conclude that knowledge from books is usually systemic, which is excellent for learning something abstract. I can only study algebra calculus anthropology and philosophy in my test books, because they can hardly be described with experience logically. And also, I am fond of reading history books and geography maps, these kinds of knowledge, to some extent, are difficult to acquire from experience. In addition, great works are all published in books so that people can understand them well, such as the Darwinism and Marxism. They are unquestionable profound and insight.

Taking into account all above factors, we can find out that despite all the merits people acquire to be skilled from the books; learning from experience seems to be more buoyant and practicing. But people cannot be logical and systemic without reading books. Therefore, from what I have discussed we have no alternative but to, keep in mind that only by combing knowledge from both on the books and in one’s experience, will a person be versatile in s/he’s field.

 

 

只是进行了一些替换...也不知道行还是不行....

只是进行了一些替换...也不知道行还是不行....

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-14 23:46:26编辑过]