ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1164|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

时态

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-3-9 19:29:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
According to scholars, the earliest writing was
probably not a direct rendering of speech, but was
more likely to begin as a separate and distinct
symbolic system of communication, and only later
merged with spoken language.
(A) was more likely to begin as
(B) more than likely began as
(C) more than likely beginning from
(D) it was more than likely begun from
(E) it was more likely that it began

这是og关于e的解释
e) in this awkward, unclear, and wordy construction, the first it must be followed by is, not was, because the theory is current; the second it acts as the subject of the subordinate clause, and this usage requires the omission of the comma after communication.
它这里对于时态是认为要用现在时,因为是理论,是客观事实,不是很理解。。。有点奇怪
求走过路过的朋友指点一下

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2018-3-10 00:19:31 | 只看该作者
OG的解釋很多是唬爛的(個人認為)。他無法自圓其說地去解釋正確選項(同樣用過去式)。觀察正確選項跟E的差別即知這裡E選項考的是not...but...平行。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2018-3-10 17:10:45 | 只看该作者
danyuchn 发表于 2018-3-10 00:19
OG的解釋很多是唬爛的(個人認為)。他無法自圓其說地去解釋正確選項(同樣用過去式)。觀察正確選項跟E的 ...

谢谢你呀
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 00:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部