According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.
According to recent studies comparing the nutritional value of meat from wild animals and meat from domesticated animals, wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is good for cardiac health.
A. wild animals have less total fat than do livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat they think is
B. wild animals have less total fat than livestock fed on grain and more of a kind of fat thought to be
C. wild animals have less total fat than that of livestock fed on grain and have more fat of a kind thought to be
D. total fat of wild animals is less than livestock fed on grain and they have more fat of a kind thought to be
E. total fat is less in wild animals than that of livestock fed on grain and more of their fat is of a kind they think is
答案是B. 但B选项也可以理解为 Wild animals have less total fat than (wild animals have) livestock, 这样不就说不通,会产生ambiguity么?
另外C选项为什么不能理解为wild animals have less total fat than (wild animals have) fat of livestock呢?这样不能算平行吗?
OG Explanation
Logical predication; Rhetoricalconstruction
The sentence reports research findings on the comparisonbetween the fat content of wild animals and that of domestic livestock. The mostsignificant error in the sentence is in the phrase they think: the pronoun theyeither lacks a referent or is meant to refer back to wild animals, which would benonsensical.
A,The pronoun they fails to refer correctly.
B,Correct. The phrase thought to be eliminates the most significant error in the originalsentence. Note that while the phrase less total fat than livestock differs from the phrase less total fat than do livestock in the original, either would be correcthere.
C,The resulting sentence is unnecessarily wordy and confusing. The pronoun that is not only superfluous, but it fails to refer back to anything.
D,The resulting sentence makes a nonsensical comparison between total fat and livestock.
E,The resulting sentence is wordy and confusing. It lacks the required parallelismin wild animals . . . in livestock. The referent of the possessive pronoun theiris ambiguous, as is the referent of the pronoun they.
RON: manhanttanprep.com
"that of livestock fed on grain" is 'the ____ of their parents and grandparents'.
for this to work in a comparison, it should be compared with 'young people's ____'.
e.g.,
Because of the tech boom, many young people's net worth is already greater than that of their parents or grandparents.
wild animals have less total fat than (wild animal have) livestock fed on grain
传统上,我们认为如果不补出动词,就可能产生上面那句这样的歧义,
但是,这个所谓的歧义,逻辑语义根本不同(wild animal have livestock-野生动物拥有家养牲畜??),语义不make sense,所以不能认为歧义;
这就是所谓的比较事物不在一个level(同一个层级)