ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1212|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一个句子

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-8-21 22:46:23 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Study selection:

Reported clinical trials that evaluated either the relationship between CVP and blood volume or reported the ssociated between CVP/CVP and the change in stroke volume/cardiac index following a fluid challenge。
请教一个句子;
请问上边这句话怎么翻译呀,“associated”是evaluated 的宾语吗





Background: Central venous pressure (CVP) is used almost universally to guide fluid therapy in
hospitalized patients. Both historical and recent data suggest that this approach may be flawed.
Objective: A systematic review of the literature to determine the following: (1) the relationship
between CVP and blood volume, (2) the ability of CVP to predict fluid responsiveness, and (3) the
ability of the change in CVP (CVP) to predict fluid responsiveness.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and citation review of
relevant primary and review articles.
Study selection: Reported clinical trials that evaluated either the relationship between CVP and
blood volume or reported the associated between CVP/CVP and the change in stroke
volume/cardiac index following a fluid challenge. From 213 articles screened, 24 studies met our
inclusion criteria and were included for data extraction. The studies included human adult
subjects, healthy control subjects, and ICU and operating room patients.

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
9#
发表于 2014-9-8 22:30:04 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2014-9-8 16:50
我是认为ssociated不能做宾语,这里either or它显然是和前边并列的,应该做宾语,但是它不是名词,而且就 ...

不会是typo么~~哈哈
8#
发表于 2014-9-8 22:29:12 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2014-9-8 16:50
我是认为ssociated不能做宾语,这里either or它显然是和前边并列的,应该做宾语,但是它不是名词,而且就 ...

不会是typo么~~哈哈
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-8 16:50:04 | 只看该作者
旺财财 发表于 2014-9-2 22:40
亲觉得的哪里有问题
Reported clinical trials that evaluated either the relationship between CVP and ...

我是认为ssociated不能做宾语,这里either or它显然是和前边并列的,应该做宾语,但是它不是名词,而且就算是association从语意上也不通
6#
发表于 2014-9-2 22:40:54 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2014-8-22 07:18
顶起来,继续求助

亲觉得的哪里有问题
Reported clinical trials that evaluated either the relationship between CVP and blood volume or reported the ssociated between CVP/CVP and the change in stroke volume/cardiac index following a fluid challenge。
是类似以SC的思考模式去判断么,就是这种不符合GMAC的平行?
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-22 07:18:51 | 只看该作者
顶起来,继续求助
地板
发表于 2014-8-21 23:07:02 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2014-8-21 23:00
下边我附了一部分原文,这是一个很非常权威的医学期刊,在文章前言里照理说不应该出错。我也并没有复制错 ...

囧。。人民日报上还经常有错别字呢。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-8-21 23:00:37 | 只看该作者
ayoyoyo 发表于 2014-8-21 22:55
你确定文中那个“ssociated”不应该是“association”……?

下边我附了一部分原文,这是一个很非常权威的医学期刊,在文章前言里照理说不应该出错。我也并没有复制错误。
而且其实就算是association reported the association我感觉也很成问题
沙发
发表于 2014-8-21 22:55:26 | 只看该作者
你确定文中那个“ssociated”不应该是“association”……?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 17:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部