求解OG13SC-41的相关问题（未被讨论的点）

lancyyao18

[size=13.63636302947998px]In 1850, Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women's property laws.

[size=13.63636302947998px](A) arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights

[size=13.63636302947998px](B) arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women

[size=13.63636302947998px](C) a treatise that advocates women's equal political and legal rights

[size=13.63636302947998px](D) a treatise advocating women's equal political and legal rights

[size=13.63636302947998px](E) a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

[size=13.63636302947998px]OG解释：
[size=13.63636302947998px]Parallelism;  Rhetorical construction
Mott s Discourse was a treatise, and it is redundant and confusing to present her as both publishing her Discourse and arguing in a treatise, as though they were two separate things. The verb arguing must be followed by a prepositional phrase beginning with for, but the verb advocating simply takes a direct object.

A    After published her Discourse ... arguing in a treatise is wordy and imprecise.
B    Arguing in a treatise is redundant and awkward.
C    The verb advocates does not work idiomatically with the prepositional phrase for changes
D    The verbal advocating does not work idiomatically with the prepositional phrase for changes
E    Correct. The title of Mott's publication is followed by a phrase describing the treatise, and argued is followed by for.


[size=13.63636302947998px]我想问下，1.关于E项的 for woman 和 for changes  会不会可能平行造成歧义？
[size=13.63636302947998px]               2. 只单独考虑这样一个句子： a treatise argued for equal political and legal rights for women。这句的意思是 指的equal political for woman and legal right for women 还是仅仅是 legal right for woman, 判断的标准是什么呢？非常谢谢！！！！

lululuna

感谢分享！               

lancyyao18

alzn2765 发表于 2014-5-27 16:50
1.关于E项的 for woman 和 for changes  会不会可能平行造成歧义？
答：平行不仅要“形式上”平行，作用和 ...

恩恩，明白了，我是太注重句子的形式了，忽略了逻辑意思。 感谢！！！

alzn2765

1.关于E项的 for woman 和 for changes  会不会可能平行造成歧义？
答：平行不仅要“形式上”平行，作用和意思上也要平行。E选项argued for...and for...这才是平行。而for equal political and legal rights for women中for women是介词短语做定语修饰 rights的，怎么可能跟for changes去平行呢？即使退一万步，不考虑逻辑意思说不说的通，即使for women真的和changes平行，也应该是for equal political and legal rights for women and changes...changes前面的for完全多余啊！作者补出这个介词for就是为了提示这个for changes是与argued for equal political and legal rights平行的,否则changes前的for应该省略。

2.答：这句的意思是 指的equal political righr for woman and equal legal right for women。
从第一个问题就发现你太纠结“形式”，而忽略了形式只是句子的排列顺序，其目的是为了表达逻辑意思。
这里equal和for women都是公用的。

lancyyao18

各位大神，求解啊！！！！！！！