ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1680|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

12号上战场,打滚跪求独立写作疯狂狠批!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-12-30 16:41:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
希望有战友帮忙!!我这个恬不知耻的家伙一战就是是舔着大脸的自!我!感!觉!良!好!
结果分数只有24!!!
二战来临,自我感觉依!然!良!好!对每一篇写出来的作文都是真!爱!
求!打!醒!

Do you agree ordisagree with the following statement:

The governmentshould support scientific research that does not have any practical use


The technology hasbeen rapidly developed in recent years. More and more scientific researches requiringgovernment subsidies have emerged, and then the conflict opinions on government’sinvestigation raised. Some people advocated that the government should focustheir assistance exclusively on the researches that have practical use,  while others argued that researches that donot have any practical use are worth investigating too. As far as I amconcerned, I am inclined to the latter.


Scientificresearches are valuable for not just their practical use, but also theirtheoretical and academic values. People who suggest the government invest onlyin research with practical use failed to notice the essential significance ofthe academic value. There are many influential scientists who major intheoretical sphere have made enormous significant differences to our world. Ifwe view the practical use of scientific research as wheels that can carry oursociety move forward, then the theoretical use of scientific research can beconsidered as the engine which the wheels can harness energy from. If thegovernment only investigates in those researches that have practical use, thedevelopment of the whole society will become decrease and finally stop.


Some people mayargue that theoretical research is useless for our daily life-which I takeleave to doubt-so that investigate in that research is a waste of money. But inlong vision, from my perspective, there will be no research that entirelyabsence practical value. For instance, human beings calculated the distancebetween earth and moon thousands of years ago, back to then, that research willbe considered as no practical use according to that context. But it is thatresearch that contributes remarkable effort to the first moon landing. Hence,we have to acknowledge that some researches may seem completely have nopractical use, but with the gradually development of our society, thoseresearches can be of great value someday.


And if we viewthis question from the government's perspective, we can find out that it is thegovernment's responsibility to sponsor varieties of scientific researches tomotivate scientists, in that way our society can develop consistently. If thegovernment treats different kinds of research unequally, some scientists whofocus on theoretical research may be disappointed and give up, then thisinequity may result in jeopardizing the progress of our society.


All in all,according to the reasons I demonstrated above, the government should supportscientific research that does not have any practical use.


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-31 16:52:15 | 只看该作者
我的作文已经烂到没人肯批了么T_T
小伙伴们帮帮忙﹌哪怕说谁意见看法都好啊(╯3╰)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-15 16:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部