ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably on a spectrum of genetic relatedness.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3099|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大神~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-12-19 10:52:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably on a spectrum of genetic relatedness.
A.     The fact of some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably
B.     That some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly while others look quite dissimilar highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely that they vary considerably
C.     With some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar, it highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely considerable variation
D.     With some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar, it is a fact that highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely a considerable variation        (B)
E.     Because some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar, this fact highlights an interesting and often overlooked feature of fraternal-twin pairs, namely they vary considerably

prep解释上面说D选项逻辑主语不对,请问在D选项中的逻辑主语是什么。。。(求轻拍。。。)还有,with引导的独立主格怎么判断逻辑主语。。。。(是不是我逻辑太差,总是判断不好逻辑主语。。。)
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
10#
发表于 2016-3-19 17:49:02 | 只看该作者
penguinvino 发表于 2013-12-19 15:42
谢谢你的回复,基本都看懂了,也明白D是怎么错了。但是我还是想问问,with引导的独立主格怎么判断逻辑主 ...

1、with独立主格结构自带主语,它的逻辑主语就是“独立主格”啊。

GWD-TN7-3:With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee.
红字就是with结构主语。

2、只有没有主语的modifier才需要找逻辑主语。
9#
发表于 2016-3-19 11:35:09 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-21 17:26:06 | 只看该作者
greygray 发表于 2013-12-19 19:13
你看看这个,总结得很好http://forum.chasedream.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=879297&highlight=%E ...

谢谢啦~
7#
发表于 2013-12-19 19:13:49 | 只看该作者
penguinvino 发表于 2013-12-19 18:00
谢谢啦~超级热情,还想问一下,是不是each引导的独立主格修饰的是each前面紧跟着的那个词,而with引导的 ...

你看看这个,总结得很好http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... B%E4%B8%BB%E6%A0%BC
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-19 18:00:07 | 只看该作者
greygray 发表于 2013-12-19 16:00
嗯。。。。我有点不知道怎么说。。。。。给我例子我能分析,这么总结我就有点不会了
真要说,就是看句子 ...

谢谢啦~超级热情,还想问一下,是不是each引导的独立主格修饰的是each前面紧跟着的那个词,而with引导的独立主格是修饰逻辑主语的?谢谢~
5#
发表于 2013-12-19 16:00:30 | 只看该作者
penguinvino 发表于 2013-12-19 15:42
谢谢你的回复,基本都看懂了,也明白D是怎么错了。但是我还是想问问,with引导的独立主格怎么判断逻辑主 ...

嗯。。。。我有点不知道怎么说。。。。。给我例子我能分析,这么总结我就有点不会了
真要说,就是看句子的意思
with的意思:“随着”或者淡淡的“因为”
套在句子里翻译过来,感觉没错就行
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-19 15:42:41 | 只看该作者
greygray 发表于 2013-12-19 11:22
嗯,怎么说呢,我觉得这句话的主语就是some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look ...

谢谢你的回复,基本都看懂了,也明白D是怎么错了。但是我还是想问问,with引导的独立主格怎么判断逻辑主语?谢谢
板凳
发表于 2013-12-19 11:22:49 | 只看该作者
嗯,怎么说呢,我觉得这句话的主语就是some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar. D选项把主语变成伴随成分了,不再是主句的一部分了。
with在这句话里找不到逻辑主语。。。。。
a fact 在这里不能像你这么说的指代,with是伴随成分、修饰成分,一般是不会在主句中代指的
某种情况下,a fact 应该是可以代指some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar:1,做同位语: scientists found out that some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar, a fact that highlights an interesting feature.
                      2, 避免重复原话,为了简练而代指: scientists found out that some fraternal twins resemble each other greatly and others look quite dissimilar. This fact highlights an interesting feature.
                      3, 为了避免歧义而代指:这个我就不会举例了,但是很常见,在it或者they之类的代词存在指代模糊问题时,用概括性或者同义词指代。

这里都不满足

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-12-19 10:55:18 | 只看该作者
哎呀, 问问prep解释中说“a fact无所指”。请问“a fact”不能指代前面的“some fraternal twins resembling each other greatly and others looking quite dissimilar”这件事么?谢谢~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部