ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1122|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于关系代词which的一点疑问(重发)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-10-13 14:18:18 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
以OG106题为例........
Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeology, and criminology.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any  substance without destroying it,
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants,having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced X-ray emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any  substance without destroying it,
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced X-ray emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any   substance quickly and without destroying it,
(E) A technique that was originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without  destroying the substance, called proton-induced X-ray emission,

答案是A,根据解释,which指代a technique. C和D都是错误答案,解释提到which incorrectly and illogically modifies emission.
但是根据MANHATTAN,Use WHICH ONLY to refer to the noun immediately preceding it. 也就是说A项里的which也应该指代emission,个人感觉很矛盾,望大侠指教~

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-13 19:43:53 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2013-10-13 18:05
Use WHICH only to refer to the noun immediately preceding it-never to refer to an entire clause.

...

辛苦了~
地板
发表于 2013-10-13 18:05:13 | 只看该作者
virgmat 发表于 2013-10-13 17:55
MANHATTAN仔细确认了下,没漏看,就是这么说的,而且还打了粗体强调。
求严谨的判断文化现行词的方法。 ...

Use WHICH only to refer to the noun immediately preceding it-never to refer to an entire clause.

我没有书,我在网上搜了一下这句话是这么说的,它是针对which是否可以指代整句话。
不过不管怎么样,你不能指望曼哈顿说的有多严谨,所以手头备上两本语法书是必要的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-10-13 17:55:11 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2013-10-13 16:48
MANHATTAN上的这个说法靠不住,或者不严谨。要不就是人家还说了别的你断章取义了 ...

MANHATTAN仔细确认了下,没漏看,就是这么说的,而且还打了粗体强调。
求严谨的判断文化现行词的方法。
沙发
发表于 2013-10-13 16:48:34 | 只看该作者
MANHATTAN上的这个说法靠不住,或者不严谨。要不就是人家还说了别的你断章取义了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 17:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部