ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4425|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助!OG13第65题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-7-28 11:34:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
65. Digging in sediments in northern China, evidence has
been gathered bv scientists suggesting that complex
life-forms emerged much earlier than thev had
previously thought.
(A) evidence has been gathered by scientists
suggesting that complex life-forms emerged
much earlier than they had
(B) evidence gathered by scientists suggests a
much earlier emergence of complex life-forms
than had been
(C) scientists have gathered evidence suggesting
that complex life-formsemerged much earlier
than
(D) scientists have gathered evidence that suggests
a much earlier emergence of complex life-forms
than that which was
(E) scientists have gathered evidence which
suggests a much earlier emergence of complex
life-forms than that

本题正确答案选C

想问下:complex life-forms emerged much earlier than previously thought这个比较结构是省略了什么内容吗?一直不太擅长比较结构,能不能帮我分析一下这个句子的结构?
万分感谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
5#
发表于 2013-8-17 10:28:01 | 只看该作者
这句话中,suggesting that 是做结果状语么?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-17 09:46:28 | 只看该作者
15801218581 发表于 2013-8-17 09:38
http://forum.chasedream.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=728449&highlight=OG%2B13%2B65   8楼

感谢!~~
板凳
发表于 2013-8-17 09:38:51 | 只看该作者
沙发
发表于 2013-7-28 12:19:26 | 只看该作者
前面的digging...china修饰的只能是人,所以后面句子的主语是scientists而不是evidence。
后面suggesting that从句里用动词emerge比用名词emergence更简洁,所以选C。
个人感觉than (scientists) previously thought吧。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 01:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部