- UID
- 803216
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-4
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
In one state, all cities and most towns have antisomking ordinaces. A petition entitled "Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction" is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, "Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
A. Health cost associate with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the states, there are relatively few retail establishment and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state laaw would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.
正确答案是C。 但是不是很明白题目问什么。是说什么情况会使选民对扩展地方条例至全州的计划的理解有误导吗?如果是这样的话,选项C说如果地方的antismoking条例更严厉的话,state law 将会取代。这怎么误导法呢?请各位指教!
|
|