ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1257|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Prep 2012 CR - 29题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-6-27 13:02:16 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
In one state, all cities and most towns have antisomking ordinaces. A petition entitled "Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction" is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, "Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?" The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government that are open to the public.
Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?
A. Health cost associate with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
B. In rural areas of the states, there are relatively few retail establishment and government offices that are open to the public.
C. The state laaw would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
D. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
E. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.

正确答案是C。 但是不是很明白题目问什么。是说什么情况会使选民对扩展地方条例至全州的计划的理解有误导吗?如果是这样的话,选项C说如果地方的antismoking条例更严厉的话,state law 将会取代。这怎么误导法呢?请各位指教!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
发表于 2013-9-5 16:18:59 | 只看该作者
cutey3 发表于 2013-9-4 16:31
同问......

典型的Evaluation Plan:
Planetition advocate statewide law to each cities.
Answer:Which circumstance make the plan misleading to voters(Weaken)

简化成weaken型的题目。
沙发
发表于 2013-9-4 16:31:10 | 只看该作者
同问......
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 02:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部