ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1181|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

题目求解惑

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-6-26 06:52:03 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
38. GWD-18-Q41
Atthe turn of the twentieth century, forest covering as much as 90 percent ofThailand and accommodating as many as 300,000 elephants, a third of themdomesticated and performing various essential tasks.
A.   coveringas much as 90 percent of Thailandand accommodating as many as 300,000 elephants, a third of them
B.   coveringas much as 90 percent of Thailandaccommodated as much as 300,000 elephants, and a third of them were
C.   coveredas much as 90 percent of Thailandand accommodated as much as 300,000 elephants, with a third
D.   coveredas much as 90 percent of Thailandand accommodated as many as 300,000 elephants, a third of them
E.    coveredas much as 90 percent of Thailandand accommodating as many as 300,000 elephants, with a third of them

答案是d,我选的a,请问为什么不能选a
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
10#
发表于 2013-6-27 14:22:51 | 只看该作者
。。。如果你选A,句子都没谓语啊。。。。。。。。。。。
9#
发表于 2013-6-27 11:40:27 | 只看该作者
大家说的都很对,E选项我之前没注意谓语错了。C的话还是感觉with伴随的主语forest不能用a third来修饰,其实with+宾语+宾补本身就是个独立主格结构,不过with要有正确的伴随对象。比如下面这句话:
With children’s programming limited at one time to a few hours a week, now at least four cable networks have dedicated themselves entirely to shows produced specifically for children.其中的with结构就明显用错了,因为with后面的宾语和宾补无法伴随four cable networks.而且这里的两件事发生有先后次序,所以表示同时伴随的结构(比如while)都是不合适的
8#
发表于 2013-6-27 08:12:26 | 只看该作者
chineuro 发表于 2013-6-26 16:31
CE中with的用法确实是错的。
with的结构表述的成分和修饰的成分必须有因果和状态上的联系,forest ...和  ...

这里WITH独立结构只是补充说明,这里很难说错,这不是C和E的主要错误点,最明显错误点还是定语和谓语的错误。
7#
发表于 2013-6-26 19:15:31 | 只看该作者
只能被覆盖不能主动,covered做定语修饰forest  accomodated才是真正主语
6#
发表于 2013-6-26 16:31:21 | 只看该作者
kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-6-26 15:22
C和E的with结构很难说有什么错误,但C和E有更明显的错误点,比如C选项中a third 表达的错误,以及domestic ...

CE中with的用法确实是错的。
with的结构表述的成分和修饰的成分必须有因果和状态上的联系,forest ...和 elephant..完全两件事情,不能用with强行连接起来。
5#
发表于 2013-6-26 16:29:06 | 只看该作者
forest covering as much as 90 percent ofThailand and accommodating as many as 300,000 elephants必须是个句子。A中这个成分没有谓语动词,不是句子。
地板
发表于 2013-6-26 15:22:23 | 只看该作者
jzhangad 发表于 2013-6-26 14:33
其实我更感兴趣的是C和E中的with结构为什么错了。个人认为此处用with有使得a third伴随主语的嫌疑,而根据 ...

C和E的with结构很难说有什么错误,但C和E有更明显的错误点,比如C选项中a third 表达的错误,以及domesticated 无法修饰a third。E选项中accommodating作为谓语动词错误。
板凳
发表于 2013-6-26 14:33:12 | 只看该作者
其实我更感兴趣的是C和E中的with结构为什么错了。个人认为此处用with有使得a third伴随主语的嫌疑,而根据句意,a third应该是指elephant而不是forest。
沙发
发表于 2013-6-26 08:49:03 | 只看该作者
covering,accommodating,这里Ving的形式不能用作谓语动词。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 16:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部