关于manhattan上一个知识点的问题 求助~~~

wandermango

在讲指代时说： The gmat always respects the repeats principle. The repeat principle : Repeated pronouns are presumed to have the same antecedent. That is, every it and its in the sentence must refer to the same singular noun; every they, them and their must refer to the same plural noun. 想问下 这句的意思是
1.在一个句子中同时出现they their 他们都指代同一个antecedent
2. 还是说一个句子出现各种的they 指代一个antecedent  同一个句子出现的their 可以指代另一个antecedent

og 13 sc 91 /12 sc 87

In an effort to reduce their inventories, Italian vintners have cut prices; their wines are priced to sell, and they do. 这个正确的句子中按分析they 指代的应该是their wines 所以应该是解释2？？？

吴下锕蒙

我觉得应该是1
你可以参考一下OG13-诊断测试 42题，有对they, their的讨论
就像Manhattan中常说的，OG经常有前后不一、自己打自己嘴巴的地方
而且，Manhattan也常说，不到万不得已不看指代模糊，而且错误选项一定不只有指代模糊。
这是我的理解。

wandermango

billkp 发表于 2013-6-9 17:17
完了，看什么什么不对

不是they的先行词=their的先行词=them的先行词么……  句子中they their 都指Ital ...

这个帖子
http://forum.chasedream.com/foru ... Bsc%2B87&page=3

so was I 吧

billkp

完了，看什么什么不对

不是they的先行词=their的先行词=them的先行词么……  句子中they their 都指Italian vintners。
我觉得their wines are priced to sell, and they do 这明明是两个个句子啊……为什么是一个句子呢？  
And they do 是个什么用法？和so they do 一样么？

问个不相关的问题：He was beaten by gamt, so did I  还是 so was I ?

enkyklios

应该是2