ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4263|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教啊~~GMAT语法中which一定是就近修饰原则吗?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-4-30 00:57:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
今天做GWD套题,遇到这样一道题,要颠覆我自己之前的一个想法了。。
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
  • Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering
  • Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
  • Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering
  • Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
  • Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

这道题的答案是E,其他部分我可以理解,但是GMAT语法中的which有一定是就近修饰原则的说法吗?因为如果是这样,E中which就是修饰Dickinson了,而实际应该修饰letter,所以我就纠结了。。我选A。

求牛人解答!!
收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
10#
发表于 2021-7-6 00:14:11 | 只看该作者
A , 如果OUtnumber 不加ing , 也可以,
9#
发表于 2021-7-6 00:12:30 | 只看该作者
X 中心语.... 跟了一个介词短语, 那么X 还是此句的中心语, 那么which可以修饰前面的这个中心语言.
A错, 因为, Letters were writeen and end ( 动词), outnumbering ( 伴随状语), End 那里用了Ing 表示伴随, 因此说不通.

B错, outnumber 这里和其他动词的关系是什么呢? Letters were written and eded, outnumber, ( 结构不对), 可以是 Letters were written, ended, and outnumber, 并列关系.
C 错, 太错乱了, 成不了句,
D 错, 成不了句, 没有谓语
E, 对, begining of , ending of 时间状语, which句子是一个从句, 修饰lettes, outnumber 是谓语.

我也是因为查Which 的修饰作用碰到了这个题, which 是就近修饰, 但是还是要看一下前一句话的中心语是什么.


8#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-30 17:14:46 | 只看该作者
vividlai 发表于 2013-4-30 12:27
比如简单的x of y
x+一个简单的介词结构

谢啦~
7#
发表于 2013-4-30 12:27:34 | 只看该作者
albee222 发表于 2013-4-30 11:38
你所说的简单的修饰结构,还有哪些呢?

比如简单的x of y
x+一个简单的介词结构
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-30 11:38:14 | 只看该作者
vividlai 发表于 2013-4-30 09:20
A +简单的修饰结构(比如这里的 to D)
which是可以跳跃修饰的,仅限在修饰B不合理(如逻辑意思不对,单复 ...

你所说的简单的修饰结构,还有哪些呢?
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-4-30 11:36:48 | 只看该作者
哦哦。。。谢谢各位的解答~明白一些了~
地板
发表于 2013-4-30 09:20:43 | 只看该作者
A +简单的修饰结构(比如这里的 to D)
which是可以跳跃修饰的,仅限在修饰B不合理(如逻辑意思不对,单复数不一致)的情况下,最好还是不要跳跃修饰

这里就是修饰D的话主谓不一致不合理,必须要求跳跃修饰
板凳
发表于 2013-4-30 09:09:30 | 只看该作者
不一定。。。which后面是were,说明指代的是一个复数名次,最近的复数名词只有letters,从语法从逻辑来看都不会指代dick....
沙发
发表于 2013-4-30 06:06:23 | 只看该作者
我开始也不理解,后面看manhattan回复说:
1、which就近修饰的问题: X of Y,which, 有三种情况:
1)如果which修饰Y逻辑上说的过去,which修饰Y
2)which修饰Y无意义,但是修饰X有意义,which可以修饰X of Y
3) which修饰X和Y都无意义,就要考虑逻辑上存在问题了
2、如果主句用的被动语态,一般不用现在分词来表达主句所产生的结果Some people say that using a present participle phrase to express the (direct/indirect) result of the preceding clause is not allowed when the preceding clause is in a passive voice.其实我也不懂他解释的是神马,但是我觉得在这里were written during  a time和outnumbering不存在结果关系,所以用outnumbering有点奇怪

哈哈,我也是新手,一起学习~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 07:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部