还是ing修饰，preceding clause指哪一句

stellalights

呵呵。。。我都不好意思再问ing修饰的了。。。

comma+ing, it MODIFIESTHE ENTIRE ACTION of the precedingclause, and it APPLIES TO THE SUBJECT of that clause;


87. According to scientists who monitored its path, an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, which brightened the Northern Lights and also possibly knocking out a communications satellite



A. an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, whichbrightened the Northern Lights and also possibly knocking


B.an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun was what recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, andit the brightened the Northern Lights and also possibly knocked

C.an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, brighteningthe Northern Lights and also possibly knocking


D. a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, recently triggered by an expanding cloud of energized particles, brightened the Northern Lights and it possibly knocked

E. a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth was recently triggered by an expanding cloud of energized particles, brightening the Northern Lights and itpossibly knocked


我明白C中的brightening是做结果状语修饰一整个句子的。但是在这句话中，comma+ing的preceding clause 不是field that surround earth么？？？不是定语从句么。。。

kiwifoodtown

chenmengmillie 发表于 2015-4-12 23:17
brightening的逻辑主语从意思上来看不应该是storm吗

不是storm，而是句子主语，请再体会句子。

chenmengmillie

kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-3-22 09:58
LZ，状语是修饰前一句的an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently trigge ...

brightening的逻辑主语从意思上来看不应该是storm吗

Hendy

三位前辈，我又蒙了
这两天刷OG，理解了N多doing 定语状语结构，晚上突然又不明白了。下边这两粒的 having有和不同哦

OG70
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
C) having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria
这个选项是错误的，但是不知道为什么having been 不行，因为这里边没有逗号所以我理解直接修饰trenches;

OG25
Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
A. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are

这个选项是正确的，有逗号但是可以向前修饰主语，S,doing,VO.

Hendy

三位前辈，我又蒙了
这两天刷OG，理解了N多doing 定语状语结构，晚上突然又不明白了。下边这两粒的 having有和不同哦

OG70
The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
C) having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria
这个选项是错误的，但是不知道为什么having been 不行，因为这里边没有逗号所以我理解直接修饰trenches;

OG25
Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
A. Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are

这个选项是正确的，有逗号但是可以向前修饰主语，S,doing,VO.

lindberghya

babybearmm 发表于 2013-3-23 03:44
I just found a official sentence:65.In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Cr ...

醍醐灌顶.....拜服NN们...

stellalights

babybearmm 发表于 2013-3-25 09:44
修饰的是前面整个clause
clause=subject+verb
所以当然要apply to subject了

这样，懂了~!谢谢baby姐

babybearmm

stellalights 发表于 2013-3-25 08:25
可是都做结果状语了，修饰的就是前面clause的结果，而不是主语，为什么还要apply to the subject呢 ...

修饰的是前面整个clause
clause=subject+verb
所以当然要apply to subject了

stellalights

babybearmm 发表于 2013-3-25 01:05
如果ing在句尾表示结果状语的话，ing前面有逗号，要求applies to the subject of that clause ...

可是都做结果状语了，修饰的就是前面clause的结果，而不是主语，为什么还要apply to the subject呢

babybearmm

stellalights 发表于 2013-3-24 19:02
还有一个问题，弱弱的问，如果ing在句尾表示结果状语的话，要不要求it APPLIES TO THE SUBJECT of that c ...

如果ing在句尾表示结果状语的话，ing前面有逗号，要求applies to the subject of that clause