请大牛来看一下，两个同位语之间不用and连接一下吗？

hlhlhlt

190.The thirteen original British colonies in North America, some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter that set forth its form of government and the rights of the colonists.

A.some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, each had a written charter

B.some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all of which had written charters

C.some that formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens, all had written charters

D.with some being formed as a commercial venture, others as religious havens, all had a written charter(A)

E.with some formed as commercial ventures, while others as religious havens, each had a written charter



题目释义：The thirteen…., some…, others…, each…

考点：1.独立主格，表示伴随，所以必须修饰主谓宾结构，而非主系表结构。

独立主格三种形式：

1)一般形式（独立部分与主句部分无太多关联）n.+n.，n.+V-ed/v-ing，n.+介词短语/形容词短语

2)with形式（与主句主语有紧密的逻辑关系）：with+宾语+宾补，如：with+n.+v-ed/v-ing/介词短语/形容词短语

3)each形式（必须前面有复数名词）： each+v-ed/v-ing，each+介词短语/形容词短语，each+n.+介词短语

*：with型独立主格在GMAT中常常被判累赘。

2.固定搭配some…others

3.set forth阐明, 宣布, 提出, 陈列, 出发

选项分析：A.Correct；some formed as commercial ventures, others as religious havens做为the thirteen original British colonies in North America的同位语，each为the thirteen original British colonies的同位语

B.Being多余；all与后面的its 单复形式不统一；全句缺少谓语动词

C.some that formed结构中some在定语从句中做主语，主动行使form动作错误；all与后面的its 单复形式不统一

D.with的存在使得some并不是指代colonies，而是与colonies相关的东西；all与后面的its单复形式不统一；这里with并没有夹心修饰的歧义，因为all/each和colonies是同一样东西，所以向前向后修饰逻辑上都一样（夹心修饰见prep 1-207补充说明）。

E.with的存在使得some不是指代colonies，而是与colonies相关的东西；while多余，因为后面的others as religious havens中没有谓语动词，while必须省(如果有谓语动词则不能省，如Some cleaned the windows, while others mopped the floor)。

WINTERLAMP

some formed ...不是句子吗 each had written ...也是句子把  这样难道不run on 吗？

Raycyn

sisichen666 发表于 2013-1-12 22:05
some...others就是固定用法啊，我类了神马。。。。。还用什么and啊。。。。比如说更加复杂的用法：I have g ...

我靠是哦

jlikel

jlikel 发表于 2016-9-7 21:30
想问一下这题未划线部分set forth为什么不用第三人称单数，明明正解A是 a character ...

是的是的 谢谢

Violet1993

看到A就觉得很奇怪啊，some formed as..., other as...., each had...form有不及物动词的词性，这里很容易就能当做完整的谓语，不ambiguous吗？

看来看去只能排除法了。。。

锕儍

jlikel 发表于 2016-9-7 21:30
想问一下这题未划线部分set forth为什么不用第三人称单数，明明正解A是 a character ...

时态吧，是过去时

jlikel

想问一下这题未划线部分set forth为什么不用第三人称单数，明明正解A是 a character

kiwifoodtown

some...others就是固定用法啊，我类了神马。。。。。还用什么and啊。。。。比如说更加复杂的用法：I have got 100 roses，Some are sent to my sisters,Some are sent to my parents,the others are sent to my girlfriend. 都是一样的啊

-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2013/1/12 22:05:41)

我也正想说这个就是固定用法的，顶你个。

hlhlhlt

some...others就是固定用法啊，我类了神马。。。。。还用什么and啊。。。。比如说更加复杂的用法：I have got 100 roses，Some are sent to my sisters,Some are sent to my parents,the others are sent to my girlfriend. 都是一样的啊

-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2013/1/12 22:05:41)

哇塞。。。我勒个去！这个。。。super简单的被我想复杂了！谢谢sisi！

sisichen666

some...others就是固定用法啊，我类了神马。。。。。还用什么and啊。。。。比如说更加复杂的用法：I have got 100 roses，Some are sent to my sisters,Some are sent to my parents,the others are sent to my girlfriend. 都是一样的啊