WSO上看到的MSF项目分级，供大家参考

xiaohai0307

Comprehensive US MSF Ranking
Since there is not a ranking of US MSFs I elected to make one. I’d like to thank ANT/TNA for his great list on MSFHQ.com it is an invaluable resource for anyone considering an MSF. This is a work in progress and I welcome any feedback. This is just my opinion and I welcome suggestion or corrections and will be more than willing to edit this.
Tier 1 MIT
Tier 1A Claremont McKenna, Vanderbilt, WUSTL, Virginia
Tier 1B Boston College, Florida, Southern Methodist, Texas, Tulane, Villanova
Tier 2 Baruch, Boston University, George Washington, Houston, Illinois, Maryland, Ohio State, Purdue, Syracuse,University of Rochester
Tier 3 Alabama, Arizona, Brandeis, Case Western, Colorado, Delaware, Florida State, Johns Hopkins, Louisiana State, Michigan State, Northeastern, Oklahoma State, Pepperdine, Rochester Institute of Technology, Temple, Texas A&M, Texas at Dallas, Tulsa, Utah
Tier 4 American University, Bentley, California Santa Cruz, DePaul, Drexel, Georgia State, Hofstra, Fordham, Loyola-IL, Loyola-MD, North Texas, RPI, Texas Tech, West Virginia, Wyoming
Tier 5 Baltimore, Cal State-Stanislaus, Clark, Denver, Fairfield, Florida International University, Golden Gate, Lewis University, Michigan-Dearborn, Nevada, Pace University, Pacific Lutheran, Penn State, Portland State, University of Portland, St. Mary’s College, San Francisco, Seattle University, Southern New Hampshire, St. Joseph’s University, St. Thomas, Suffolk, SUNY Buffalo, Tampa, Virginia Commonwealth, Walsh, Webster, West Texas A&M


Tier 1, Full buy and sell side recruiting, national presence.
Tier 1A More regional and less buy side recruiting.
Tier 1B Regional, less BB presence, more MM and boutique.
Tier 2 F500 becomes more prominent, placement is almost exclusively regional.
Tier 3 F500 predominates, sell side recruitment is limited, mostly through networking.
Tier 4 Almost exclusively F500, much more hustling/networking required.
Tier 5 Institutions that are very regional in placement, networking is essential.
Tiers 4 and 5 are blurry, they are all very regional and if you want F500 or IB you need to network.

说明一下，这个排名主要是作者和身边一些对学校有一定的研究朋友讨论的结果，排名的依据是从项目质量和就业情况来看的(当然，主要还是指美国人的就业。)
Anyway,供大家参考吧，第一次知道Tulane声望这么高，B家相对..咳咳

Karmalot

罗村msf今年还真有中国人去bb
还有个去了GS
虽然不算target 但是simon 的 network比你们想像的好多了 足够你把简历递到bb vp的脸上
天天这没戏那没戏

-- by 会员 durant (2012/12/15 17:45:53)

有没有更多信息分享一下？去了哪个部门，大概啥背景

贱才子

罗村，baruch个人觉得可以往前一档。。。。。还有gt成绩不能代表学生素质。。。。

durant

罗村msf今年还真有中国人去bb
还有个去了GS
虽然不算target 但是simon 的 network比你们想像的好多了 足够你把简历递到bb vp的脸上
天天这没戏那没戏

贱才子

基本靠谱，nova可以再进一档，三档以下排的没啥意思

Karmalot

项目的价值 = 你出来啥样 - 你进去时候啥样

项目不会把所有人变成一个结果，一方面每个人有自己的选择和偏好，另一方面每个人进去时候条件不同

比如你之前的work exp很不solid，没去过任何BB/any big name，就算（very unlikely though）进了普林MFin，能找到BB实习的几率也非常低

hangli2

when more and more people adopt the same strategy, i.e. taking a finance degree, the arbitrage opportunity will eventually disappear.

efficient market hypothesis doesn't work in the stock market, but works here!

travis0710

不是wustl之后的msf都没戏么     连wustl都是semi

-- by 会员 remint (2012/12/15 16:52:31)

即使是MIT，杀进华尔街也变得越来越难。回国的情况当然好一些，不过海龟越来越多，竞争越来越激烈了


最后看的还是自己的实力

remint

不是wustl之后的msf都没戏么     连wustl都是semi

travis0710

其实罗切斯特在CD这么火爆的原因无非是

1）CDer们热捧msf，2）Simon商排不错，3）Simon在纽约州（呃···虽然离city比康涅狄克大学还远···）。。。。


但是想靠UR的msf break into BB 还是有点难吧 （此话不负责，听在读学生讲的）

-- by 会员 ElShaarawy (2012/12/15 13:32:19)

基本上没戏 个人认为