求问跳跃插入语修饰问题

z53495532

我现在经常可以看到很多 句子 是 S+V+O，Y【插入语】，doing/ done/ which/that etc...这类形式的句子，我想问的是，是不是只要看到这类句子就可以认为 插入语后面的修饰语是跳跃插入语修饰的，还是说必须得结合实际情况来看呢，求解释啊。

z53495532

不知道兄台对现在分词有没有研究。 OG13的104题【OG12 105】题
Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen observation and love of the natural world.
(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
我对A选项有点迷惑。因为主语，ING，谓宾的结构是可以写成 ING，主渭滨的形式的， 那么A选项好像就变成了Carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix potter, in her book illustrations capitalized on her keen observation.......  这样看下来，A选项好像也没问题啊。

sisichen666

一般情况是插入语直接忽略，直接找主干，但是修饰语这个东西就是考得比较活。。。其是插入语就是修饰语，但是十分短小，很易分辨，但是如果插入语=修饰语，比较长的话（S，修饰语，修饰语.....）这就一定要好好分析一下了,当然G是很不喜欢修饰成分排一队的，一定有更好的rephrase的方法，一般就是正确选项了。。。其实还是。。。。。（LZ别打我）——就题说事儿

z53495532

受教了，但是我还是想问问 诸如 主谓宾，插入语，修饰语的结构， 假如修饰语不是修饰像这道题一样修饰前面整句话而是修饰单个单词，是不是都会跳过插入语去修饰前面部分的名词呢，因为我确实碰到了很多诸如过去分词，同位语之类是无视插入语直接修饰插入语前面部分的。

sisichen666

which的跳跃问题其实应该避免考虑，越想越乱，但是以个人观点来看，1.G只考过一种跳跃A of B，which的这种——而且考的还超级简单，根据logic就能判断；2.G会尽量避免which跳跃的使用，即使有也不是考点，是非划线部分的陈述；3.一般情况的which都是就近修饰前面的N，而当有时which指代前面整句话，which指代较远N时——这是which被认为错的情况

具体到这道题，就是修饰前面整句话，需要使用slowing，而不是which，无论是不是应该跳跃修饰，which是不能修饰前面整句话的

z53495532

题目来了，白勇语法上面的
Analysts blamed May's sluggish retail sales on unexciting merchandise as well as the weather,colder and wetter than was usual in some regions. which slowedsales of barbecue grills and lawn furniture.
(A)colder and wetter than was usual in some regions, which slowed
(B)which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions, slowing
(C)since it was colder and wetter than usually in some regions, which slowed
(D)being colder and wetter than usually in some regions, slowing
(E)having been colder and wetter than was usual in some regions and slowed

白勇对AC的解释就是说它们错误的修饰了some regions, 但我觉得应该是可以跳过插入语修饰weather的吧，你怎么看

z53495532

题目来了，白勇语法上面的
Analysts blamed May's sluggish retail sales on unexciting merchandise as well as the weather,colder and wetter than was usual in some regions. which slowedsales of barbecue grills and lawn furniture.
(A)colder and wetter than was usual in some regions, which slowed
(B)which was colder and wetter than usual in some regions, slowing
(C)since it was colder and wetter than usually in some regions, which slowed
(D)being colder and wetter than usually in some regions, slowing
(E)having been colder and wetter than was usual in some regions and slowed

白勇对AC的解释就是说它们错误的修饰了some regions, 但我觉得应该是可以跳过插入语修饰weather的吧，你怎么看

sisichen666

无题无真相。。。。。具体题目具体分析。。lLZ贴几个您的题目咱来讨论