ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In some species of cricket, the number of chirps per minute used by the male for attracting females rise and fall in accordance with the surrounding temperature, and they can in fact serve as an approximate thermometer.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3467|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教prep07的一道语法题~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-10-13 15:43:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Q2. p1-sc      95.   (29661-!-item-!-188;#058&003962)

Unlike frogs that metamorphose from tadpoles into adults within a one-yearperiod, it takes three to four years for the mountain yellow-legged frog ofthe Sierra Nevada to reach adulthood, and so they are restricted to deeperbodies of water that do not dry up in summer or freeze solid in winter.

(A)it takes three to four years for the mountain yellow-legged frog of the SierraNevada to reach adulthood, and so they are
(B)it takes the mountain yellow-legged frog of the Sierra Nevada three to fouryears until it reaches adulthood, and therefore it is
(C)in the Sierra Nevada, mountain yellow-legged tree frogs take three to fouryears to reach adulthood, thus being
(D)mountain yellow-legged frogs of the Sierra Nevada take three to four yearsuntil they reach adulthood, thus
(E)mountain yellow-legged frogs of the Sierra Nevada take three to four years toreach adulthood, and so they are
答案是E,请问and so可以这样连用么?还有我不太明白D的分词作从句有什么不对,谢谢啦~~~~~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-13 20:53:14 | 只看该作者
我嘞个去,试着系统跟LZ亲说一下哈:
说做定语,其实就是修饰名词:svo+v-ing(无逗号直接修饰前面的名词)
说做状语,其实就是修饰preceding clause,而在做状语的时候捏,又可以分为伴随状语,和结果状语(这就需要看下context来分辨是伴随还是结果了):1.v-ing,svo(在这里v-ing是动词修饰语,但是需要满足v-ing的逻辑主语为主句主语s)2.svo,doing(在这里一种情况是表示伴随状语,即要求和主句谓语动词同时发生的,表示伴随V,其也要求逻辑主语为s,就是s可以发出v-ing这个动作;而第二种情况就是表示结果状语,修饰preceding clause,表示伴随immediate结果;当然还有主系表为主句时,v-ing就直接修饰主语)
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/13 18:01:21)

看完帖子再来补充一点,当svo,doing的时候,还有一种情况是 V-ing修饰名词,只能修饰主句主语,主句的谓语必须是Be。谢谢sisichen666~~终于明白啦~~
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-13 20:23:07 | 只看该作者
我嘞个去,试着系统跟LZ亲说一下哈:
说做定语,其实就是修饰名词:svo+v-ing(无逗号直接修饰前面的名词)
说做状语,其实就是修饰preceding clause,而在做状语的时候捏,又可以分为伴随状语,和结果状语(这就需要看下context来分辨是伴随还是结果了):1.v-ing,svo(在这里v-ing是动词修饰语,但是需要满足v-ing的逻辑主语为主句主语s)2.svo,doing(在这里一种情况是表示伴随状语,即要求和主句谓语动词同时发生的,表示伴随V,其也要求逻辑主语为s,就是s可以发出v-ing这个动作;而第二种情况就是表示结果状语,修饰preceding clause,表示伴随immediate结果;当然还有主系表为主句时,v-ing就直接修饰主语)
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/13 18:01:21)

做了这么久的题才发现有这样的区别,真是惭愧的很啊,谢谢你的解释~我去看你推荐的帖子啦,有不懂的再厚脸皮来请教啊~~~
12#
发表于 2012-10-13 18:02:32 | 只看该作者
貌似是有个帖子来着,楼主参考下哈,写得挺全的:http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-764753-1-1.html
11#
发表于 2012-10-13 18:01:21 | 只看该作者
我嘞个去,试着系统跟LZ亲说一下哈:
说做定语,其实就是修饰名词:svo+v-ing(无逗号直接修饰前面的名词)
说做状语,其实就是修饰preceding clause,而在做状语的时候捏,又可以分为伴随状语,和结果状语(这就需要看下context来分辨是伴随还是结果了):1.v-ing,svo(在这里v-ing是动词修饰语,但是需要满足v-ing的逻辑主语为主句主语s)2.svo,doing(在这里一种情况是表示伴随状语,即要求和主句谓语动词同时发生的,表示伴随V,其也要求逻辑主语为s,就是s可以发出v-ing这个动作;而第二种情况就是表示结果状语,修饰preceding clause,表示伴随immediate结果;当然还有主系表为主句时,v-ing就直接修饰主语)
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-13 17:08:01 | 只看该作者
第二题,serving使用伴随状语导致逻辑错误,有作后置定语修饰temperature的歧义存在
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/13 16:13:36)

什么时候分词是做定语修饰的,什么时候是做伴随状语的,我晕了,求解啊~~~~
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-13 17:06:22 | 只看该作者

nope


that statement is totally wrong!


and can used with adverb to show some kinds of relationship with the former part
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/13 16:41:39)

懂啦,谢谢~
8#
发表于 2012-10-13 16:41:39 | 只看该作者
1.and so这样使用没有问题,有承接关系,就像and so, and thus, 都可以使用。
2.(D) take … until没有这种用法; 使用v-ed作定语修饰前面的名词,不符合逻辑
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/13 16:10:36)


5. GWD26-Q5




The particular design of muscles and bones in the neck and limbs of theturtle allow that it can draw in its exposed parts such that an attackercan find nothing but hard shell to bite.



A.      allow that it can draw inits exposed parts such that



B.      allow it to draw in itsexposed parts, and so



C.      allows for it to draw inits exposed parts and that



D.     allows that it can draw in its exposed parts, and so



E.       allows it to draw in its exposedparts, so that



这个题中有人就说D选项不对因为and so不能连用啊~~~


-- by 会员 呆牛牛 (2012/10/13 16:33:32)





nope


that statement is totally wrong!


and can used with adverb to show some kinds of relationship with the former part
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-13 16:33:32 | 只看该作者
1.and so这样使用没有问题,有承接关系,就像and so, and thus, 都可以使用。
2.(D) take … until没有这种用法; 使用v-ed作定语修饰前面的名词,不符合逻辑
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/13 16:10:36)

5. GWD26-Q5


The particular design of muscles and bones in the neck and limbs of theturtle allow that it can draw in its exposed parts such that an attackercan find nothing but hard shell to bite.

A.      allow that it can draw inits exposed parts such that

B.      allow it to draw in itsexposed parts, and so

C.      allows for it to draw inits exposed parts and that

D.     allows that it can draw in its exposed parts, and so

E.       allows it to draw in its exposedparts, so that

这个题中有人就说D选项不对因为and so不能连用啊~~~
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-10-13 16:32:07 | 只看该作者
LZ亲去看看manhattan上关于现在分词或过去分词的讲解,或者下一下笔记材料,别一直做题,越做越混乱的。。亲。。。
-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/13 16:14:51)

很惭愧的说Manhattan已经看过了,但我一直理解的是分词从句可以修饰主语啊,which引导的从句才是必须修饰紧跟的名词。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-5 21:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部