ChaseDream
搜索
12345下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7594|回复: 40
打印 上一主题 下一主题

语法请教

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-21 16:05:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式

Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while they once ranged over virtually all of the continental United States except for a small strip in the extreme Southwest.
A. Elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, which would make it seem that elk are mountain dwellers, while
B. The fact that elk now live almost solely in the Rocky Mountains would make it seem that they are mountain dwellers, but
C. It would seem that elk would be mountain dwellers because of their living now solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, but still
D. Now living almost solely in the Rocky Mountains, it would seem that elk were mountain dwellers, although
E. It seems that elk would be mountain dwellers from the fact that they now live solely almost in the Rocky Mountains, since



GWD-29-Q41

Gas hydrates, chemical compounds of water and natural gas, are increasingly being studied for their potential to be huge reservoirs of energy, possibly causing sea floor instability, and significant contributors to global warming.



  • to be huge reservoirs of energy, possibly causing sea floor instability, and
  • to be huge reservoirs of energy, possibly causing sea floor instability, and even as
  • as huge reservoirs of energy, possibly causing sea floor instability, and
  • as huge reservoirs of energy, and the possible cause of sea floor instability,
  • as huge reservoirs of energy, as possible causes of sea floor instability, and even as

   Answer: E.













To identify the Level of Generality for each sentence in a paragraph, we can assign a value ranging from 0–4 or more as follows
不知道为什么这儿有for  我觉得应该用of 指句子的概括性,如果这儿用for那它在这儿是什么意思呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
41#
发表于 2012-9-26 22:24:29 | 只看该作者
是的,那using的逻辑主语还是system。。。。
40#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-26 22:23:43 | 只看该作者
我不知道有没有根据
自己的理解; v+ing可以修饰名词也可以修饰动词 ,所以我认为using 修饰的是created。是说用……的数据创造出来的system.
39#
发表于 2012-9-26 22:15:28 | 只看该作者
CD的错,呵呵,我当时点击回复的是一楼!我以为会显示就是对一楼的回复呢。。。。。另外,你有没有觉得using没有modify的noun?按字面理解应该是modify system的。。因为它紧跟在created之后。。。但是,这明显不合逻辑。。。。
38#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-26 21:58:02 | 只看该作者
不好意思,,,我其实是另发贴问了,不过人品不好,贴沉了,我就又回来问了
37#
发表于 2012-9-26 21:53:07 | 只看该作者
created啊。
-- by 会员 slr257 (2012/9/26 21:45:56)

LS的大哥。。。。他把好几个问题都连着问了,上面他问的都第三题了,您回的是第一提(首页的)。。。。怪不得都没看懂呢
36#
发表于 2012-9-26 21:45:56 | 只看该作者
created啊。
35#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-26 06:13:53 | 只看该作者
什么过去分词作定语?这里没有过去分词啊?
34#
发表于 2012-9-26 05:48:01 | 只看该作者
就是定语!过去分词作定语,如果放在名词之后,可以加逗号的。manhattan上有例子。其实,我有点纠结using。。。这个似乎是个典型的GMAT错误。。。也许写新闻的人没练过GMAT。。。。。
33#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-26 05:19:52 | 只看该作者
另一点,其实最让我头疼的是,我不想看到介词as作定语 可以跨过介词短语 to the war去修饰 名词relation 或者women,  因为你说了没有and什么的。不能用名词+介词短语(定语1)介词短语(定语2)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-11 00:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部