求教各位大牛一道GWD老题，求指教！求讨论！

hexin0909

Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

1. it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
   
2. it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
   
3. appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
   
4. appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
   
5. appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who
   
   
   这道题印的答案是E，个人被那个what的成分给搞混了，求大牛们分析一下！
   另外还有很多疑问，求讨论！
   

白菜白菜

答案错了 应该是D吧

DUKB24

Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who


这道题印的答案是E，个人被那个what的成分给搞混了，求大牛们分析一下！
另外还有很多疑问，求讨论！

-- by 会员 hexin0909 (2012/9/9 21:20:54)

it is not evidence of human ； it is evidence related to human （so you should use the that-clause）A.E OUT


stunning evidence cannot be logically parallel with hunting ground     B.C OUT


what-clause here acts as a noun   (from what -clause  = from sth)

hexin0909

跪求各位大牛帮忙啊- -