请教一下：prove adj.与prove to be adj.有什么区别？

jeffery2541

感觉这两种表达总是有区别的，可又说不出来到底是哪里有不一样。
请明白的同学讲讲吧~

yakev6

回mm，我也是东搜搜西看看...半瓶子醋。。。
以下摘自Ron
_____________________________________________________________
Siying What's the difference between "derive" and "are derived"?
--
This is one of VERY few verbs whose meaning isn't verv different between active
and passive forms.
X derives fmm Y -> Y is the source of X (general statement of fact)
Sugar derives from sugarcane.
Species X derive from species Y (through evolution)
X is derived from Y -> this is actually performed (usually by people)
Sugar is derived rom sugarcane ->True (people do this)
Species X is derived from species Y -> Doesn't make sense, unless you are talking about literally making species in a lab.
________________________________________________________________________
还有一种解释是，prove是系动词，和sound什么的一样都可以用主动表示被动...

另外看看这个帖子会不会有启发，
adj n vs n to be adj
形容词描述的是名词的内在属性，不定式描述的是被赋予的属性。
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/although-the-first-pulsar-or-rapidly-spinning-collapsed-t3500.html

其他的...再听听mm的想法

杯uu

鹅皇陛下万岁 发表于 2017-6-10 15:21
ron的意思就是proved可以简单作为prove的过去式用，不一定非要表示被动

谢谢啦！！~~~

鹅皇陛下万岁

杯uu 发表于 2016-8-22 14:21
看不懂这个，觉得这两句话跟刚刚讲的adj是内在属性 to be 是人为的相悖，希望前辈指教 ...

ron的意思就是proved可以简单作为prove的过去式用，不一定非要表示被动

杯uu

yakev6 发表于 2012-10-8 15:14
from ron："proved" can also be an active-voice verb, especially in reference to descriptive qualitie ...

看不懂这个，觉得这两句话跟刚刚讲的adj是内在属性 to be 是人为的相悖，希望前辈指教

zhenyan1985

感谢分享！               

candice1112

Sankofa 发表于 2013-9-25 16:21
就是说，A‘s derived from B 是人为参与造成的。

谢谢！！谢谢！！！！

Sankofa

就是说，A‘s derived from B 是人为参与造成的。

candice1112

X is derived from Y -> this is actually performed (usually by people)

这个没有看懂………………~~~~(>_<)~~~~ 求NN指教！！！

jeffery2541

jeffery2541 发表于 2012-10-14 23:03
感觉prove的用法与appear非常像呢。。。-- by 会员 sisichen666 (2012/10/8 15:52:38)

是的呢~某种程度 ...

你是？

几米的世界9

《当幸福来敲门》《believe》