og 12 sc 53 ，and 与as well as（已认真解决）

ainiAnnie

53. The nineteenth century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

(A) a critique of all chemistry since Robert Boyle as well as a vision of a

(B) a critique of all chemistry following Robert Boyle and also his envisioning of a

(C) a critique of all chemistry after Robert Boyle and envisioning as well

(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of

(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of

Parallelism; Rhetorical construction

The main objective of the sentence is to describe “Essay on Heat and Light” as Davy’s presentation of his own experiments and to further explain that the essay served as both a critique of previous chemistry and a vision of a new kind of chemistry. The clearest, most effective form for providing this explanation of the essay’s function is to make

critique and vision both appositives of “Essay on Heat and Light,” and to present them in a parallel structure.

我的疑问如下：（A的平行最好无疑问，可是as well as 也不要求平行呀...）
and 和 as well as 不能替换，and 表示并列关系；as well as表示一种从属关系，从属部分去掉对句子的语法不产生影响（这个无疑问）。
在og解释中，有这么一句话：the essay served as both a critique of previous chemistry and a vision of a new kind of chemistry.我自己也觉得a critique of previous chemistry 和a vision of a new kind of chemistry 从逻辑上来看也应该是并列关系，再者 as well as 也不是平行标识（也就是说as well as 前后不一定要平行，这点不是非常确定，但是查了Manhattan上面列举的平行标识没有这个），所以权衡了下选了 B

Og 上解释说Critique and his envisioning are not parallel，但是词性是一样的，在广义上也可以说是平行的。

求NN指导。

zzloveyibo

还是听Ron的话吧，不要太过琢磨as well as和and的区别，GMAC不太会考，因为太subtle。

不过我想问的是，C中的and和 as well会重复么？

还有我觉得as well as既包含“也”又包含”和“的意思在里面，因为你们看BCD中，无不是没有as well as而有and的

句子，都由also或as well在来表示”也“，所以。。。

pouvoir

好详细啊 谢谢NN们

perseus33

DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

abjure

.Parrallelism
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of

只有复杂名词才可以和动作名词平行，错误
and also 用法也错误
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of


这里简单动名词和复杂动名词不能平行，错误


爱妮去翻manhattan 213 ，上面讲的很详细，我现在摘抄的就是摘自那里

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/4/29 23:45:22)

Suri 说D的选项解释，我觉得不理解，OG上面D的解释说他不平行。。  critiquing 不可以做分词理解吗？all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of。。。 不就平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 17:57:21)

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

如果把critiquing看成是分词，那么就更不平行了呀~！

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 18:06:15)

不会啊，我用红色标注出来了 ，all chemistry  和 a version 不是平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 19:14:58)

你要认真读句子哟~
首先，你这句话表达的逻辑意思和原句要表达的逻辑意思不一样。而在一般情况下，我们是不能改变原句的逻辑意思的。
其次，你再认真读你的那个句子：

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.
他怎么会自己批评 自己希望发现的前景呢？？

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 19:27:02)

你红色标明的他怎么会自己批评 自己希望发现的前景呢？？，这点我明白，那是OG E选项的解释， 我同意 它也可以用在D 选项。  我的问题是OG D 选项的解释是 Th e two descriptors are not parallel.，我觉得从语法角度上D选项表述是平行的。 你觉得呢？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 21:26:53)

平行不是这么看的...它整个语境的设计就排除了这种平行的可能性，你就没有必要偏要这么找平行。
算按照你的那个来看，这种平行也是不完美的。只能说大体上平行。
并且og的解释是没有错的 ：Th e two descriptors are not parallel，og此处默认two descriptors 是 a critique and a vision
这是我的理解，希望有帮助。

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 22:34:11)

thx

ainiAnnie

.Parrallelism
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of

只有复杂名词才可以和动作名词平行，错误
and also 用法也错误
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of


这里简单动名词和复杂动名词不能平行，错误


爱妮去翻manhattan 213 ，上面讲的很详细，我现在摘抄的就是摘自那里

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/4/29 23:45:22)

Suri 说D的选项解释，我觉得不理解，OG上面D的解释说他不平行。。  critiquing 不可以做分词理解吗？all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of。。。 不就平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 17:57:21)

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

如果把critiquing看成是分词，那么就更不平行了呀~！

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 18:06:15)

不会啊，我用红色标注出来了 ，all chemistry  和 a version 不是平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 19:14:58)

你要认真读句子哟~
首先，你这句话表达的逻辑意思和原句要表达的逻辑意思不一样。而在一般情况下，我们是不能改变原句的逻辑意思的。
其次，你再认真读你的那个句子：

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.
他怎么会自己批评 自己希望发现的前景呢？？

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 19:27:02)

你红色标明的他怎么会自己批评 自己希望发现的前景呢？？，这点我明白，那是OG E选项的解释， 我同意 它也可以用在D 选项。  我的问题是OG D 选项的解释是 Th e two descriptors are not parallel.，我觉得从语法角度上D选项表述是平行的。 你觉得呢？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 21:26:53)

平行不是这么看的...它整个语境的设计就排除了这种平行的可能性，你就没有必要偏要这么找平行。
算按照你的那个来看，这种平行也是不完美的。只能说大体上平行。
并且og的解释是没有错的 ：Th e two descriptors are not parallel，og此处默认two descriptors 是 a critique and a vision
这是我的理解，希望有帮助。

abjure

.Parrallelism
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of

只有复杂名词才可以和动作名词平行，错误
and also 用法也错误
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of


这里简单动名词和复杂动名词不能平行，错误


爱妮去翻manhattan 213 ，上面讲的很详细，我现在摘抄的就是摘自那里

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/4/29 23:45:22)

Suri 说D的选项解释，我觉得不理解，OG上面D的解释说他不平行。。  critiquing 不可以做分词理解吗？all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of。。。 不就平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 17:57:21)

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

如果把critiquing看成是分词，那么就更不平行了呀~！

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 18:06:15)

不会啊，我用红色标注出来了 ，all chemistry  和 a version 不是平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 19:14:58)

你要认真读句子哟~
首先，你这句话表达的逻辑意思和原句要表达的逻辑意思不一样。而在一般情况下，我们是不能改变原句的逻辑意思的。
其次，你再认真读你的那个句子：

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.
他怎么会自己批评 自己希望发现的前景呢？？

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 19:27:02)

你红色标明的他怎么会自己批评 自己希望发现的前景呢？？，这点我明白，那是OG E选项的解释， 我同意 它也可以用在D 选项。  我的问题是OG D 选项的解释是 Th e two descriptors are not parallel.，我觉得从语法角度上D选项表述是平行的。 你觉得呢？

ainiAnnie

.Parrallelism
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of

只有复杂名词才可以和动作名词平行，错误
and also 用法也错误
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of


这里简单动名词和复杂动名词不能平行，错误


爱妮去翻manhattan 213 ，上面讲的很详细，我现在摘抄的就是摘自那里

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/4/29 23:45:22)

Suri 说D的选项解释，我觉得不理解，OG上面D的解释说他不平行。。  critiquing 不可以做分词理解吗？all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of。。。 不就平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 17:57:21)

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

如果把critiquing看成是分词，那么就更不平行了呀~！

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 18:06:15)

不会啊，我用红色标注出来了 ，all chemistry  和 a version 不是平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 19:14:58)

你要认真读句子哟~
首先，你这句话表达的逻辑意思和原句要表达的逻辑意思不一样。而在一般情况下，我们是不能改变原句的逻辑意思的。
其次，你再认真读你的那个句子：

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.
他怎么会自己批评 自己希望发现的前景呢？？

abjure

.Parrallelism
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of

只有复杂名词才可以和动作名词平行，错误
and also 用法也错误
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of


这里简单动名词和复杂动名词不能平行，错误


爱妮去翻manhattan 213 ，上面讲的很详细，我现在摘抄的就是摘自那里

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/4/29 23:45:22)

Suri 说D的选项解释，我觉得不理解，OG上面D的解释说他不平行。。  critiquing 不可以做分词理解吗？all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of。。。 不就平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 17:57:21)

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

如果把critiquing看成是分词，那么就更不平行了呀~！

-- by 会员 ainiAnnie (2012/8/1 18:06:15)

不会啊，我用红色标注出来了 ，all chemistry  和 a version 不是平行吗？

ainiAnnie

.Parrallelism
(D) critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of

只有复杂名词才可以和动作名词平行，错误
and also 用法也错误
(E) critiquing all the chemistry done since Robert Boyle as well as his own envisioning of


这里简单动名词和复杂动名词不能平行，错误


爱妮去翻manhattan 213 ，上面讲的很详细，我现在摘抄的就是摘自那里

-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/4/29 23:45:22)

Suri 说D的选项解释，我觉得不理解，OG上面D的解释说他不平行。。  critiquing 不可以做分词理解吗？all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of。。。 不就平行吗？

-- by 会员 abjure (2012/8/1 17:57:21)

The nineteenth-century chemist Humphry Davy presented the results of his early experiments in his “Essay on Heat and Light,” critiquing all chemistry from Robert Boyle forward and also a vision of new chemistry that Davy hoped to found.

如果把critiquing看成是分词，那么就更不平行了呀~！