ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3775|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep198,196 3个小问题,求解答~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-24 22:53:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
198.(GWD-18-Q31)Between 1990 and 2000 the global economy grew more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture to 1950.

A.Between 1990 and 2000 the global economy grew more than it did during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture

B.Between 1990 and 2000 the growth of the global economy was more than that during 10,000 years, from when agriculture began

C.The growth of the global economy between 1990 and 2000 exceeds that which had been for 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture

D.The growth of the global economy between 1990 and 2000 exceeds what it has been for 10,000 years, from when agriculture began(A)

E.The growth of the global economy between 1990 and 2000 exceeded what it did for the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture





A. Correct
it完全指代the global economy,并不特指19902000年之间的global economy

小菜有个问题,关于it指代问题~
我记得prep上说it是完全指代,也就是说,包括修饰核心词的修饰语~那么对于A的这个时间段,我一直认为这个包含在“修饰核心词的修饰语”中,所以我就把A排除了。。。但是错了。。。这是为什么呢,这个时候为什么时间修饰就不是修饰语了呢?

——————————————————————————分割线————————————————————————————————

再来一道~
196.(GWD-1-Q41)Leaching, the recovery of copper from the drainage water of mines, as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established as early as the eighteenth century, but until about 25 years ago miners did not realize that bacteria take an active part in the process.

A.as a method of the extraction of minerals, it was well established

B.as a method of the extraction of minerals well established

C.was a well-established method of mineral extraction

D.was a well-established method of extracting mineral that was(C)

E.had been a method of mineral extraction, well established



1,小菜对于C&D没区分开~
虽然prep上的解释说,as early as the eighteenth century是修饰前句的,但是这怎么就不能修饰method呢,而且拿什么说这个时间状语是修饰前句而不是修饰别的名词呢~

2,prep上的解释说well established做非限定性修饰逻辑含义错误,这个怎么理解?

就酱,麻烦nn们帮我看看,能说一点是一点~先谢谢各位啦,抱拳啦

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
13#
发表于 2013-9-16 10:05:15 | 只看该作者
seubomb 发表于 2012-5-18 09:36
Between 1990 and 2000 与 during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture这两个时间段不是先 ...

同LS 同问.
12#
发表于 2012-5-18 09:36:47 | 只看该作者
Between 1990 and 2000 与 during the 10,000 years from the beginning of agriculture这两个时间段不是先后发生的么,到底在GMAT中对于时间先后或者动作先后是怎么界定的呢?请教?
11#
发表于 2012-5-18 00:10:32 | 只看该作者
Between 1990 and 2000,状语,修饰grow
10#
发表于 2012-5-17 23:55:42 | 只看该作者
另外我有个问题,对于198这道题,为什么A选项的两个一般过去时都是正确的呢,这两个动作不是先后发生,应该用过去完成时的么?
9#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-25 22:10:00 | 只看该作者
来个人吧~help me~~~~
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-25 09:18:31 | 只看该作者
芝麻来人啊~
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-25 00:37:10 | 只看该作者
A里面的it就是指代the economy,表想多了····
然后第二个题目,顶一下啦
-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/4/25 0:25:36)

貌似不是我想多了,这点我之前好像特意问过baby姐,有一点印象~~
6#
发表于 2012-4-25 00:25:36 | 只看该作者
A里面的it就是指代the economy,表想多了····
然后第二个题目,顶一下啦
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-24 23:37:00 | 只看该作者
还有一个问题是小菜突然想到的:
prep中有说:“the growth of sth. was不如sth. grew简洁;from when agriculture began to 1950的不如from the beginning of agriculture to 1950好”

那么我想问,像这样简洁性的问题,是不是最后考虑?
也就是说,如果正确答案里面有类似“the growth of sth. was或者from when agriculture began to 1950”的结构,那么可以忽略不计吧,因为这只是简洁与否而已~?

还有一个问题,就是prep里面待商榷的东东:介词+when~~~这种结构一出现就错???
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 00:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部