ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2005|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【MD每日一问】LR 1#

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-4-3 11:27:09 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
When 100 people who have not used cocaine are tested for cocaine use, on average only 5 will test positive. By contrast, of every 100 people who have used cocaine 99 will test positive. Thus, when a randomly chosen  group of people is tested for cocaine use, the vast majority of those who test positive will be people who the have used cocaine.
A reasoning error in the argument is that the argument:
(B) attributes to every member of the population the properties of the average member of the population
(C)fails to take into account what proportion of the population have used cocaine

I chose B cause i thought the percentage calculated from mass research could not be applied to individual properly. Anyway, the key shows that C is the best choice. Could you provide me some help regarding to the mistake i made? Thanks.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-4-3 15:15:52 | 只看该作者
got it! thank you=)
沙发
发表于 2012-4-3 15:06:11 | 只看该作者
这题举个量化的例子比较好说明。假设一个randomly chosen的group里总共有1百万人,其中有100个是用过cocaine的,另外999,900都是没用过cocaine的。那按照平均数来讲,这100个用过cocaine的人里有99个会被测定为positive,而这999,900个没用过caocaine的人里,则会有999,000*0.05=49950个被test positive.所以这个group里被test positive的人的绝大多数其实是从未用过cocaine的。为什么会出现这个情况呢?因为这个group里用过cocaine跟没用过cocaine的人的比例严重失调,是1:9999,so this brings us to choice C.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 17:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部