Many financial experts believe that policy makers at the Federal Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future.
Many financial experts believe that policy makers at the Federal Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are almost certain to leave interest rates unchanged for the foreseeable future.
A.Reserve, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
B.Reserve, now viewing the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation and are
C.Reserve who, now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, are
D.Reserve, who now view the economy to be balanced between that of moderate growth and low inflation, will be E.Reserve, which now views the economy to be balanced between moderate growth and low inflation, is
答案选择:A
我的疑问是:now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation 这部分会不会有 修饰前面Many financial experts believe....的歧义? 我当初第一次看到这个选项的时候就感觉有歧义。 会不会作状语修饰前面的主句啊? 希望大牛们帮帮忙!
简单的说说:now viewing the economy as balanced between moderate growth and low inflation,典型的独立现在分词结构作状语,在从句里修饰整个从句,这里可以把它作为原因状语,viewing与逻辑主语policy makers相一致。
所以,稍微分析下句子结构就不会有“修饰前面Many financial experts believe....的歧义”这种奇怪的想法了。
第二,虽然里viewing最近的名词是 Federal Reserve,但从逻辑上判断肯定应该是跳跃修饰policy makers,关于这个思路大家可能会有疑惑,我之前也对这种根据逻辑来判断语法的方式很难理解,但后来刷manhattan的时候在比较部分看到了这样一个点,“Right:Vishal eats more carrots than donuts. ”(5th,P130),单纯从语法上来看,SVO句型之后的比较对象没有加助动词肯定存在歧义,但manhattan从逻辑上判断说“dounts can not eat carrots,so dounts must be the object.”
所以,我归纳为只要逻辑上很清晰,那么逻辑就可以主导语法。那么这道题同理,所以我自己认为,如果CD中不考虑其他问题的话,用who来跳跃修饰policy makers也是可以的