名词+介词短语+修饰语问题（GWD25-Q5）

chaseshi

各位童鞋，想问一下关于介词短语的修饰问题。

如：N. + 介词短语 +修饰语，曼哈顿上所说，一般N+of介词短语+修饰语，此修饰语一般修饰名词，并不修饰of短语中的名词。


另OG12的126题：The use of lie detectors is based on the assumption that lying produces emotional reactions in an individual that, in turn, create unconscious physiological responses.


that引导的定语从句修饰reactions，为何不能修饰individual？难道N.+in介词短语也一样？

——————————————————————————————————————————————

追加：GWD25-Q5.
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress (that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere).

that 如果是跳过介词短语难道是修饰devastation and enslavement？ 那么后面has也应该变成have，而本题是修饰progress。不解！望高手答复！

请各位大侠指点！“N. + 介词短语 +修饰语”有什么固定的规律么？

lorajinghe

我也是醉了……差点被绕进去，还好我去百度了一下，For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress (that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere).这道题的真实答案不是这个！
而是For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify the devastation and enslavement in the name of progress that have decimate the native peoples of the Western Hemisphere
现在回答一下，对！that不会修饰介词短语包括of后面的修饰词
ps下次看清楚答案再琢磨为什么==

chaseshi

GWD25-Q5.
For many revisionist historians, Christopher Columbus has come to personify devastation and enslavement in the name of progress (that has decimated native peoples of the Western Hemisphere).

that 如果是跳过介词短语难道是修饰devastation and enslavement？ 那么后面has也应该变成have，而本题是修饰progress。不解！望高手答复！

michaelmay17

看到in an iindividual,介词短语，可以跳过