ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3327|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12 SC85 had,were,did 求解释

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-9-17 23:38:13 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
85. Salt deposits andmoisture threaten to destroy the Mohenjo-Daroexcavation  in Pakistan,the site of an  ancient civilization  
that ?ourished at thesame time as the civilizations in the Nile Delta and  the river valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates.

(A) that ?urished at the sametime as the civilizations

(B) that had ?ourished at the sametime as had the civilizations
(C) that ?ourished at the sametime those had

(D) ?ourishing at thesame time as those did

(E) ?ourishing at thesame time as those were

根据OG的解释,C,D中did,were是awkeard and unnecessary     但是,C中had则解释说是the wrong verb tense
为什么呢,求解释啊!!!






收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
发表于 2011-10-29 19:02:20 | 只看该作者
首先,这道题的比较不涉及助动词补出问题,所以补出的助动词是多余的。其次,这道题要求一般过去时,所以had错。
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-19 22:15:30 | 只看该作者
沉了,怎么沉了
             up!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-2 12:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部