Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions. (A) in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, (B) if criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food, (C) in attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food, (D) if some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior, (E) in attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior, 这道题不知道如何下手啊?为什么要改成从句啊?另外,此题设计到逻辑主语吗?逻辑主语到底如何应用?超级费解啊?跪求大牛指点!!!!! -- by 会员 xingxc11 (2011/8/26 6:41:40)
非牛 这里的in attributing…的逻辑主语接下来的名词the perpetrators,但是意思上逻辑主语应该是attorneys想要改变逻辑主语就变成状语从句,就像这里if引导的条件状语从句,虽然被动结构省略了主语attorneys 像是这种opening modifier很容易考到逻辑主语的问题 |