ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Simply because they are genetically engineered does not make it any more likely for plants to become an invasive or persistent weed, according to a decade-long study published in the journal Nature.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2782|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep 07-1-103 关于being的错误用法

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-23 10:48:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
103. (30029-!-item-!-188;#058&004082)

Simply because they are genetically engineered does not make it any more likely for plants to become an invasive or persistent weed, according to a decade-long study published in the journalNature.

(A) because they are genetically engineered does not make it any more likely for plants to

(B) because it is genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to

(C) being genetically engineered does not make it any more likely that plants will

(D) being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely to

(E) being genetically engineered does not make a plant any more likely that it will become
这里的being从句做主语,但是突然想到prep里的一个语法点,being错误使用:以下几种表达中being属于多余

a) being + n. b) being + adj. c) as being + n./adj./v-ing
这里不是符合being +adj的形式吗?或者说engineered按照句意只能是过去分词,而不是形容词?是这样吗?求教,谢谢。



being错误使用:以下几种表达中being属于多余

a) being + n. b) being + adj. c) as being + n./adj./v-ing
这里不是符合being +adj的形式吗?或者说engineered按照句意只能是过去分词,而不是形容词?是这样吗?求教,谢谢。

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 15:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部