ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2489|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

新手报到,今天新东方第一天布置Argument48.

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-7-16 22:19:31 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
“The profitability of Croesus Company recently restored to private ownership, is a clear indication that business fare better under private ownership than under public ownership.”


In the argument, the author concludes that private ownership can improve the profitability of Croesus Company than public ownership. At first glance, the analysis appears thorough and compelling. However, merely based on profitability, the conclusion fails to provide sufficient information regarding business fare. This argument is unconvincing for several reasons.

In the first place, profitability comes from many factors, not just private ownership or public ownership. If the finance condition is good, mostly company will make money. And some uncertain factors, such as company workers relationship with managers, may determine the profitability. Therefore the assumption can not be founded.

In the second place, the conclusion depends on an assumption that Croesus Company make more money than before just because change the ownership. Without a doubt, the profitability of Croesus Company has raised, however, other company would not make more money than before and even may bankrupt by change ownership. In fact, in face of such limited evidence, it is fallacious to draw any conclusion at all.

In the third place, the arguer false to establish a causal relationship between profitability and ownership. However, common sense informs that public ownership can make money as well as private company, there is fails to causal relationship. So, the assumption is unfounded.

In conclusion, the arguer fails to substantiate his claim that private ownership can improve the profitability of Croesus Company than public ownership. Because the evidence cited in the analysis is too weak to lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To strengthen the argument, the arguer must convince us that other important thing. In addition, the arguer could have to provide more precise information to support his claim.

今天第一次接触GMAT,请大家拍砖。里面有一些模板,请谅解,谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
发表于 2011-7-18 15:15:02 | 只看该作者
感觉模板太多 自己的发挥太少
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-7-17 20:40:09 | 只看该作者
没有人看么?随便点评一下吧。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-25 03:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部