GWD-TN-1-16 求讨论求指教

yuyaoshishi · 发表于 2011-7-15 18:40:32

GWD1-Q16:
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

A.   a greater proportion than it was
B.   a greater proportion than
C.   a greater proportion than they have been
D.   which is greater than was so
E.   which is greater than it has been
答案B，为什么这里than后面不用补充直接可以接In any..... THXTHXTHXTHXTHXTHX

vinbobo · 发表于 2011-7-16 19:59:04

a greater proportion than any previous election.= a greater proportion than the portion in any previous election.

只要是和前面比较部分相同的，都可以省略
省略的标准是不引起歧义
但是，如果修饰名词的从句或句子发生时态变化时，必须补充助动词
如果有歧义时，需补充结构

yuyaoshishi · 发表于 2011-7-16 19:06:28

dingdingdingding

gmatbiguo · 发表于 2011-7-16 10:41:50

想起来了A应该写成a greater proportion than it did

B的话，因为是状语比较in the presidential campaign of 1992 VS in any previous election,所以可以直接跟上比较内容。

gmatbiguo · 发表于 2011-7-16 10:14:51

同问：为什么不选A? A在语法上有问题么？还是A与B相比，B更简洁，所以选B?

yuyaoshishi · 发表于 2011-7-16 09:32:13

谁能告诉我自己顶自己顶自己顶！！！！

yuyaoshishi · 发表于 2011-7-15 20:07:25

那请问什么时候可以省略什么时候是than后面是要补充完全的啊谢谢啊

nemiah · 发表于 2011-7-15 18:51:38

补充的话就是a great portion than that in any previous election. 这个that省略了。

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2008E2-SC-197 | TN-01-SC-16 (BAHB)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

GWD-TN-1-16 求讨论求指教

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()