ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4685|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【OG12-SC-98】ETS解释和正确答案不符哇~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-1 19:47:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
98. EventhoughClovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.
(A) EventhoughClovis points, spear points with longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces, have been found all over North America, they are named for the New Mexico site where they were first discovered in 1932.
(B) Although named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, Clovis points are spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto their faces and have been found all over North America.
(C) Named for the New Mexico site where they have been fi rst discovered in 1932, Clovis points, spear points of longitudinal grooves chipped onto the faces, have been found all over North America.
(D) Spear points with longitudinal grooves that are chipped onto the faces, Clovis points, even though named for the New Mexico site where first discovered in 1932, but were found all over North America.
(E) While Clovis points are spear points whose faces have longitudinal grooves chipped into them, they have been found all over North America, and named for the New Mexico site where they have been fi rst discovered in 1932.

正确答案是A
斯认为可以翻译为:即使C points(……)在北美的很多地方都被发现,但是他们仍以首次发现的地方命名

OG上的解释是: In this sentence, the apparent incompatibility that must be clearly expressed is that although the spear points are named for a particular place in New Mexico, they are in fact found throughout North American.

很显然OG是说:即使spear points是以首次发现地命名的,但是实际上他们在北美的许多地方都被发现

这不是与A正确选项的意思重心相反么~~

大家讨论一下下哇~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
7#
发表于 2012-9-22 20:31:54 | 只看该作者
同发现这个问题,但是逻辑上应该还是解释中的更靠谱,所以在做题的时候会觉得A选项的逻辑有问题。
6#
发表于 2011-5-11 07:37:56 | 只看该作者
其实没问题,解释只是说要描述出incompatibility,而不是说要描述出那个重心。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-6 08:56:00 | 只看该作者
地板
发表于 2011-5-3 17:31:13 | 只看该作者
LZ看的好仔细呀!确实如果OG的解释要更完美一些的话,重心倒过来写更加好。感觉这个解释的重点是为了强调A好在很正确地将形成incompatibility的两方分别是哪两点表述出来了。尤其OG对于B的解释就很明显看出B就是将INCOMPATIBILITY的两方描述错了。 所以对于A的解释相对随意了一点,强调到底是哪两个方面形成contrast, 而没有太在意到底哪个是‘虽然’,哪个是‘但是’。

总的来说还是赞同LZ的意见啊
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-2 23:18:59 | 只看该作者
还是米有人~~~
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-2 10:28:25 | 只看该作者


童鞋们都不在么~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 18:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部