已解决 Og 12 49 vs. 47 矛盾啊

mongmong · 发表于 2011-5-1 10:43:07

49. The automotive conveyor-belt system, which Henry Fordmodeled after an assembly-line technique introduced by Ransom Olds, reducedfrom a day and a half to 93 minutes the required time of assembling a Model T.
(A) from a day and a half to 93 minutes the required time ofassembling a Model T
(B) the time being required to assemble a Model T, from aday and a half down to 93 minutes
(C) the time being required to assemble a Model T, a day anda half to 93 minutes
(D) the time required to assemble a Model T from a day and ahalf to 93 minutes
(E) from a day and a half to 93 minutes, the time requiredfor the assembling of a Model T
Rhetorical construction; Idiom
Theunderlined portion of the original sentence is awkward because the verb reducedis followed by a prepositional phrase rather than the direct object time.Changing this structure so that the object immediately follows the verb,reduced the time, also allows an idiomatic error to be corrected.

可是，在第47题：

47. Five ?edgling sea eagles left their nests in western Scotlandthis summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised sincetransplants from Norway began in 1975.

iambigchan · 发表于 2012-11-11 20:03:32

如果把“the required time of assembling a Model T 加长”，使得宾语很长很长，这样可以宾语后置吗？

mongmong · 发表于 2011-5-17 00:08:21

Thanks.

kikisunflower · 发表于 2011-5-5 23:44:34

没什么矛盾的……
22楼+1~

kikisunflower · 发表于 2011-5-5 23:41:25

bring to 怎么可能是固定搭配……即使是，那bring to的to后面至少该跟个名词吧？

mongmong · 发表于 2011-5-5 23:32:24

4楼，
“49题说verb (reduce) 后面直接要跟direct object“
这句解释哪里来的？我翻了OG，没有。。。

-- by 会员 kikisunflower (2011/5/5 22:22:06)

Line 1 to 6, bottom right on page 708. Thanks.

kikisunflower · 发表于 2011-5-5 22:26:16

47题是因为the number of后面太大一坨了，才把to 34 提到前面来的啊。。。。

其实就是bringing （the number of wild birds successfully raised sincetransplants from Norway began in 1975）to 34

49题里面time后面的修饰又不长，能用正常语序就用正常语序啊，犯不着后置

没有矛盾吧……楼主，你这个关于矛盾的解释哪里来的？

kikisunflower · 发表于 2011-5-5 22:22:06

4楼，
“49题说verb (reduce) 后面直接要跟direct object“
这句解释哪里来的？我翻了OG，没有。。。

mongmong · 发表于 2011-5-5 22:11:41

不分开的bring to是固定搭配，带来的意思。而分开的是bring sth to sb,但是47题没有说出sb这样的成分，此时就是用不分开的bring to sth的形式。

-- by 会员 mzz831 (2011/5/5 1:07:17)

哦，原来还有这个意思，但是Og解释里给option E说的是... it was not the eagles themselves but rather the entire action of their leaving their nests that brought the number to 34, 所以bring to 在这里不是固定搭配？疑惑阿。。。。

troypei · 发表于 2011-5-5 09:22:19

不分开的bring to是固定搭配，带来的意思。而分开的是bring sth to sb,但是47题没有说出sb这样的成分，此时就是用不分开的bring to sth的形式。

-- by 会员 mzz831 (2011/5/5 1:07:17)

同意楼上 bring to 固定搭配 reduce在句中做及物动词直接接宾语比中间加上状语更清晰明确

已解决 Og 12 49 vs. 47 矛盾啊

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()