A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980. (A) that CEO's now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times (B) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times (C) that, on average, CEO's now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio! (D) CEO's who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio (E) CEO's now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times 问一个语法。 选后是跟答案一样认为是C,但是我认为CEO'S是CEO‘s pay的省略。所以A CEO's与blue-collar workers,不对等。 B,a ratio that compares to 42 times 如果是定语从句,前后不对等,如果是同位语,怪异。。。 Dceo's认为是ceo's pay省略与blue collar workers 不对等 E没有that,Eceo's成了ceo is doing的省略,前后比较不对等 大家有没有不同意见?
最后,我看了几个人的说法,大家认为CEO'S就是CEOS,居然是复数!!!!!!!!疯狂中
不过希望斑竹来在确认一下、
其次,倍数,有人说是倍数与比例不可比较。。。所以C对。B a ratio that compares to 42 times就有问题了,因为比例ratio不可与倍数比较。但是还是求牛人确认
关于CEO‘s到底代表了什么 Ron解释如下
“”that sort of punctuation issue, which is hotly debated among english-language authorities, will DEFINITELY not show up on the test. rest assured.
same deal with the ongoing heated debate over the best way to write out the names of decades. 80s? '80s? 80's? '80's? i've seen all of these propounded by reputable sources, but, fortunately for you, you won't have to make the call. “”