Dear, see my comments in below: "你能经历到啥层面?呵呵!" You already know? Or you think only you know? Then what's the point of this discussion? 清华不具有代表性?那找海跑作为代表性的? 真搞,呵呵! If we are talking about representativeness, the population should be big enough to include most schools. 清华 per se obviously does not meet this requirement. Then what about 北大,北外贸,北外,复旦,交大,to name just a few. Please do not apply only what you know to generalize everything. Very misleading...
呵呵,从我经历的层面上讲,Yes! 但我也知道这不具代表性,仁者见仁,智者见智,所以把自己的思路和大家分享一下; “据统计”,请问,据什么统计,who performed this 统计? 统计局?What are the stats? 再次,我们说的total population,仅用清华来举例,貌似也不具代表性吧?难道说每个清华毕业的都优秀? 楼歪了,back to the topic,关于PWC上海MM的所谓“过劳死”问题,的确很值得同情,但四大的人都是这么走过来的,我们都应该学会照顾好自己的身体,公司没有逼你不能take sick leave. 最近还看到媒体评论说四大没有工会,所以导致了这个问题,不知行业内人士怎么想,有工会就会有用了么?在此飘过~~~
你能经历到啥层面?呵呵! 清华不具有代表性?那找海跑作为代表性的? 真搞,呵呵! -- by 会员 2012man (2011/4/20 10:52:15)
-- by 会员 bradfordchen (2011/4/20 11:18:06)
顶bradford哈哈 |