ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5163|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

语法求助 prep 103 谢谢大家

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-13 23:25:08 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
Prep103
The parachutelike membranes of Africa's scaly-tailed flying squirrels differ from those of the flying squirrels in the family Sciuridae because they are attached to a cartilage rod at the elbow instead of the wrist.      

(A) because they are attached to a cartilage rod at the elbow instead of
(B) because of being attached to a cartilage rod at the elbow rather than at
(C) in their attachment to a cartilage rod at the elbow instead of being attached at
(D) in that they are attached to a cartilage rod at the elbow rather than at
(E) in their being attached to a cartilage rod at the elbow instead of
答案是B
我想问下大家,D中的they不会错误指代吗?为什么不是就近指代呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
15#
发表于 2011-6-9 11:11:15 | 只看该作者

请问下 那么有没有从句主语指代主句宾语的情况呢??或者 A OF B 结构做主句主语 从句主语指代B 的???

主从对位指代算是平行指代的一种。
平行位置的指代读者很容易读出指代对象的,所以不存在歧义,they能够很容易读出是指代The parachutelike membranes.
-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2011/6/8 20:39:14)

14#
发表于 2011-6-9 10:40:29 | 只看该作者
主从对位指代算是平行指代的一种。
平行位置的指代读者很容易读出指代对象的,所以不存在歧义,they能够很容易读出是指代The parachutelike membranes.
-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2011/6/8 20:39:14)


谢谢你,我终于明白了。
13#
发表于 2011-6-9 10:40:18 | 只看该作者
主从对位指代算是平行指代的一种。
平行位置的指代读者很容易读出指代对象的,所以不存在歧义,they能够很容易读出是指代The parachutelike membranes.
-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2011/6/8 20:39:14)

谢谢你,我终于明白了。
12#
发表于 2011-6-8 20:42:38 | 只看该作者
不会有歧义吧
A不同B是in that...they如何如何逻辑上应该是指前者,即A,这里没有冲突

如果是后者怎么怎么样那是应该强调下
-- by 会员 powers (2011/3/16 20:29:39)


请问,是不是they 指代的都是parachutelike,只是不同品种的squirrels 的之间的不同,跟
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.



A.      that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

B.      that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

C.      that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

D.      CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
这里的their一样,都是指代工资,根据一定的平行结构,这里的their pay 默认指代CEO,所以,不存在歧义性?
-- by 会员 clisalong (2011/6/8 18:12:51)


their pay中的their指代blue-collar workers. 因为 419 times someone's pay和42 times someone's pay平行,所以后面和someone和前面的someone能够清晰指代,没有歧义
11#
发表于 2011-6-8 20:39:14 | 只看该作者
主从对位指代算是平行指代的一种。
平行位置的指代读者很容易读出指代对象的,所以不存在歧义,they能够很容易读出是指代The parachutelike membranes.
10#
发表于 2011-6-8 18:12:51 | 只看该作者
不会有歧义吧
A不同B是in that...they如何如何逻辑上应该是指前者,即A,这里没有冲突

如果是后者怎么怎么样那是应该强调下
-- by 会员 powers (2011/3/16 20:29:39)

请问,是不是they 指代的都是parachutelike,只是不同品种的squirrels 的之间的不同,跟
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.



A.      that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

B.      that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

C.      that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

D.      CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
这里的their一样,都是指代工资,根据一定的平行结构,这里的their pay 默认指代CEO,所以,不存在歧义性?
9#
发表于 2011-6-8 17:20:31 | 只看该作者
A.  instead of 前后不对称。而且instead of一般不用与介词的比较啊!
B.because of 不接复杂结构。特别是不接动名词。一般接名词,就算名词有修饰也要中心名词明确。
C.instead of 前后不对称啊。being也不对
D.我觉得根据平行只能选这个,很对称啊!
E.instead of前后不对称。
感觉这题不用考虑they啊!答案是D吧!?但是我的问题是in that表原因这个结构一般不是都避免的么!
真心不知道了。。坐等解释。
8#
发表于 2011-6-8 17:00:44 | 只看该作者
同问。有人解析吗?
7#
发表于 2011-3-16 20:29:39 | 只看该作者
不会有歧义吧
A不同B是in that...they如何如何逻辑上应该是指前者,即A,这里没有冲突

如果是后者怎么怎么样那是应该强调下
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 01:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部