ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1958|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

暴不明白的一道题,大牛现身吧我快吐血了

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-10 13:34:59 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
The sate ha propose newrules that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses, rules intended to ensure that atleast one nurse is assigne for every four patients put through triage in a hosptal emergncy room.
A.rules intended to ensure that atleast one nurse is assigne for every four patients put through triage in a hosptal emergncy room
B. rules with the intent of ensurinng one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients to be put through tagein a hospital emergency room
C. with the intent of ensuring that at lease one nurse should be assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room that are put through triage
这题选A。。。可我一上来就锁定了C。。。给出的解释是第二个rules是第一个的同位语。。我就彪了。。。就算是同位语也不应该两个rules啊。。请大牛快现身阿。。拜。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-10 14:45:01 | 只看该作者
对于C选项:
1. with the intent有修饰that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses的歧义.
2. ensuring that后面不用should + be. 直接加verb.
3. put through triage修饰patients,对比之下A里面put through triage 直接放在patients 后面可以省去that are,更简洁。
对于同位语,完全可以是同一个词,只要两者附加修饰的内容不同,解释了rules的两个方面。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 05:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部