ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2136|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11 91 不存在代词指代歧义吗?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-2 20:30:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
91In theory, international civil servants at the United Nations are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governmentsin practicehowever, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employees’ paychecksassigned by them to the United Nations
(A)for their employees’ paychecksassigned by them
(B)for the paychecks of their employees who have been assigned
(C)for the paychecks of their employeeshaving been assigned
(D)in place of their employees’ paychecksfor those of them assigned
(E)in place of the paychecks of their employees to have been assigned by them

难道这里不存在代词指代歧义吗?their 可以就近指代allowances,也可以指代主语governments啊???
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-3 09:23:38 | 只看该作者
allowance 怎么会有employee?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-4 11:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部