section-11-7求教

futureflow

section-11-7： 7. One noted economist has （made a comparison of the Federal Reserve and an automobile as racing through a tunnel, bouncing） first off one wall, then the other; the car may get where it is going, but people may be hurt in the process.
(A) made a comparison of the Federal Reserve and an automobile as racing through a tunnel, bouncing
(B) made a comparison between the Federal Reserve and an automobile racing through a tunnel, bouncing
(C) compared the Federal Reserve with an automobile as racing through a tunnel and which bounced
(D) compared the Federal Reserve to an automobile racing through a tunnel, bouncing
(E) compared the Federal Reserve with an automobile that races through a tunnel and it bounces
答案是D，
但是D的这个bouncing的修饰没有歧义地修饰tunnel吗 ，为何不是and bouncing明确的修饰automobile

section-12-25
The record of the past is always incomplete, and（ the historian who writes about it inevitably reflects ）the preoccupations of their own time.
(A) the historian who writes about it inevitably reflects
(B) the historian writing about it will inevitably reflect
(C) a historian writing about it inevitably reflects
(D) writing about it, it is inevitable for historians to reflect
(E) historians in writing about it inevitably reflect


答案是E。C哪里错了呢？ C只是泛指啊。。。

section-13-5： The expected rise in the price of oil could（ be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have） an economy free of inflation.
(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility of having

答案是E，但是主语是ecpected rise,  谓语怎么不是has和diminishes？  
谢谢了~

luopite

historians in writing about it inevitably reflect
这里的in writing不就是做定语修饰historians吗？所以这里也是特指的
只不过原文是用who引导从句来修饰而已了，在表达相同意思的情况下，直接用分词做定语比定语从句要简洁。

guohanwen

第二个e没有错。。。c的错误是a historian单数，与后边的their own time 不相对应。

futureflow

感谢luopite你的回答

第二题的答案是E，是没有who从句限定的，也是泛指啊 ？

luopite

1。楼主你这样改把racing和bouncing用and连接共同修饰automobile是改变原文的意思了……不能说是怎么看着顺眼级怎么该，原文的意思是要保持的。bouncing在逻辑上是不能修饰tunnel的，tunnel不是bounce的动作发出者，因此也没有修饰歧义一说。如果某个现在分词在形式上和结构上同时可以修饰两个对象，这样会导致修饰歧义。
2.原文是特指，用who引导从句来修饰historian了，是不能改成泛指的，这样又扭曲原文意思了。
3.A中be 和diminish是并列的，都跟在could后面，是要用原型的。
那么E中have更是直接跟在could 后面的，当然用原型了，同时diminish和have并列。
of having是用来修饰possibility的

拙见，求高人指点