状语比较

xuqiuchen · 发表于 2010-9-17 22:48:21

Q8: PP70. A
Employment costs rose 2.8 percent in the 12 months that ended in September, slightly (less than they did) in the year that ended in the previous quarter.
解释：修饰分数用less
A.   less than they did
B.   less than it did
C.   less than they were
D.   ！lower than
E.   lower than they were

D项可不可以理解为状语比较啊，就是"in September"与"in the year that ended in the previous quarter"的状语比较。如果D项是less than可以么？
谢谢啦

若雪 · 发表于 2011-6-28 04:08:28

UP~~~

我也有这个疑惑~~~状语比较貌似就不用补足主谓宾了~

-- by 会员 jianglindenise (2011/6/27 23:50:55)

个人以为，这道题如果答案是less than也是可以的。
但是问题是这道题的D是Lower than。有cost lower than还是增长的cost lower than的歧义。

jianglindenise · 发表于 2011-6-27 23:50:55

UP~~~

我也有这个疑惑~~~状语比较貌似就不用补足主谓宾了~

xuqiuchen · 发表于 2010-9-18 20:01:15

因为之前看过状语比较的例句:Rice has protein of higher quality than usual/everbefore/1000 years ago/people expected.所以比较疑惑两种的不同。。。请赐教啦

newalan · 发表于 2010-9-18 12:28:22

大哥，状语怎么比较啊！？比较的是成本上升的幅度

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2007E1-SC-24 | TN-24-SC-8 (IXMZ)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

状语比较

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()