ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2052|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

好像这道没讨论过TN-12 Q13 GWD-24-35(CD-10-35)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-29 23:27:06 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
The milk of many mammals contains cannabinoids, substances that areknown to stimulate certain receptors in the brain. To investigate the functionof cannabinoids, researchers injected newborn mice with a chemical that isknown to block cannabinoides from reaching their receptors in the brain. Theinjected mice showed far less interest in feeding than normal newborn mice do.Therefore, cannabinoids probably function to stimulate the appetite.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.      Newborn mice do notnormally ingest any substance other than their mothers’ milk.

B.      Cannabinoids are the onlysubstances in mammals’ milk that stimulate the appetite.

C.      The mothers of newbornmice do not normally make any effort to encourage their babies to feed.

D.      The milk of mammals wouldbe less nutritious if it did not contain cannabinoids.

E.       The chemical that blockscannabinoids from stimulating their brain receptors does not independentlyinhibit the appetite.

答案是E,我选了C,有没有NN能够帮我讲讲这题的思路?55555555
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
发表于 2010-8-30 07:22:03 | 只看该作者
btw,你发错区了
沙发
发表于 2010-8-30 07:21:14 | 只看该作者
e正确

如果这个抑制剂本身就一直appetite那么跟s的作用就没什么关系了

所以这个是非常重要的前提以得到题干的结论
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 01:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部