请教OG12 137 看不明白的结构

向着美好前进

Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples
of the kind of composer who receives popular accla
while living, often goes into decline after death, and
never regains popularity again.

(A) often goes into decline after death, and never
regains popularity again
(B) whose reputation declines after death and ne
regains its status again
(C) but whose reputation declines after death and
never regains its former status
(D) who declines in reputation after death and wh
never regained popularity again
(E) then has declined in reputation after death an
never regained popularity

我对这个句子的结构理解是who和whose分别连接两个定语从句修饰composer，中间用but连接。OG对于B的解释“The two clauses are not parallel, lack a
coordinating conjunction, and do not describe the same thing”

像这种两个定语从句之间也是一定要连词连接的吗？

浅吟天

还想问LL,  B的解释中提到"The two clauses are not parallel.....,and do not describe the same thing."   这do not describe the same thing怎么理解的丫~

-- by 会员 优由圈 (2010/6/4 19:01:11)

对，我也不理解这里的解释。

-- by 会员 mongmong (2011/3/14 23:48:21)

同样不理解

powers

大概意思是，如果没有连词but，还硬这么说那就。。“The two clauses are not parallel, lack a
coordinating conjunction, and do not describe the same thing”

只能这么理解了

mongmong

还想问LL,  B的解释中提到"The two clauses are not parallel.....,and do not describe the same thing."   这do not describe the same thing怎么理解的丫~

-- by 会员 优由圈 (2010/6/4 19:01:11)

对，我也不理解这里的解释。

落落幽蓝

如果没有连词的话直接用whose，前面的逗号也很confusing吧

wanrita

还想问LL,  B的解释中提到"The two clauses are not parallel.....,and do not describe the same thing."   这do not describe the same thing怎么理解的丫~

-- by 会员 优由圈 (2010/6/4 19:01:11)

同样关注这个问题。
（个人觉得，是不是因为没有用连词,且whose也可以指物的，所以就让人感觉不到到底在修饰谁。呃...  可能不怎么说得过去，期待NN解释）

yexuu

我觉得这道题的问题是regains是修饰谁的，如果修饰composer的，那么应该是并列结构，但从这个答案看的话，应该是修饰reputation的，所以就是两个定语从句，中间用but相连。anyway，单从做题角度，其它选项的错误很明显啊。

afei0128

我认为从逻辑意义上来理解，这两个定语从句必须用连词连接。这个感觉有点像列举吧……

Christianyang

顶楼上一下

优由圈

还想问LL,  B的解释中提到"The two clauses are not parallel.....,and do not describe the same thing."   这do not describe the same thing怎么理解的丫~