ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2109|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12 111 VS OG 12 110 (who 的位置)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-24 21:46:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
不好意思,我不懂在CD帖子上的内容划线或者加颜色,大家教教我。
希望NN可以能谈谈关系代词指代模糊解题体会。 例如OG中who的位置。对比两个who的修饰对象是否产生歧义。
110 OG解释着重强调WHO的从句位置不同会产生不同歧义。 111正确选项的who位置似乎结构和110相似,但OG不认为who的指代对象有歧义。  

110. Published in Harlem, the owner and editor of The
Messenger were two young journalists, Chandler Owen
and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his
reputation as a labor leader.
(A) Published in Harlem, the owner and editor of The
Messenger were two young journalists, Chandler
Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later
make his reputation as a labor leader.
(B) Published in Harlem, two young journalists,
Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who
would later make his reputation as a labor
leader, were the owner and editor of The
Messenger.
(C) Published in Harlem, The Messenger was owned
and edited by two young journalists, A. Philip
Randolph, who would later make his reputation
as a labor leader, and Chandler Owen.
(D) The Messenger was owned and edited by two
young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip
Randolph, who would later make his reputation
as a labor leader, and published in Harlem.
(E) The owner and editor being two young
journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip
Randolph, who would later make his reputation
as a labor leader, The Messenger was published
in Harlem.

Logical predication; agreement
A modifying phrase must be placed near the word
it modifi es. Here, the incorrect placement of the
modifying phrase published in Harlem makes the
phrase describe the owner and editor when it
should describe Th e Messenger. Th e use of the
singular owner and editor is puzzling: did one
journalist own and the other edit? Or did they
jointly own and edit? It is also unclear which of
the two journalists is described in the clause
beginning who.
A Published in Harlem incorrectly modifi es the
owner and editor; references are unclear.
B Published in Harlem incorrectly modifi es two
young journalists; references are unclear.
C Correct. In this sentence, the modifi er
correctly describes Th e Messenger; the verbs
indicate that both journalists played both
roles; and the relative clause clearly shows
Randolph, not Owen, as the owner of the
reputation.
D Th e relative clause (who … leader) lacks a
clear antecedent; placement of published in
Harlem is awkward and unclear.
E Being introduces an awkward construction;
the relative clause (who … leader) does not
have a clear antecedent.

111. Construction of the Roman Colosseum, which was
offi cially known as the Flavian Amphitheater, began in
A.D. 69, during the reign of Vespasian,
was completed
a decade later, during the reign of Titus, who opened
the Colosseum with a one-hundred-day cycle of
religious pageants, gladiatorial games, and
spectacles.
(A) which was offi cially known as the Flavian
Amphitheater, began in A.D. 69, during the reign
of Vespasian,
(B) offi cially known as the Flavian Amphitheater,
begun in A.D. 69, during the reign of Vespasian,
and
(C) which was offi cially known as the Flavian
Amphitheater, began in A.D. 69, during the reign
of Vespasian, and
(D) offi cially known as the Flavian Amphitheater and
begun in A.D. 69, during the reign of Vespasian it
(E) offi cially known as the Flavian Amphitheater,
which was begun in A.D. 69, during the reign of
Vespasian, and
Grammatical construction; Verb form
Th e main subject of the sentence is Construction,
and it has two main verbs: began and was
completed. Th ese two verbs should be connected
by the conjunction and to preserve their equal
grammatical status. Both verbs should be in
simple past tense.
A Th e conjunction is missing before the second
main verb, was completed.
B Begun is the wrong verb form.
C Correct. Th e two verbs of the main clause are
in simple past tense and are joined with and.
D Th ere is no need to use the pronoun it as the
subject of was completed, because Roman
Colosseum (modifi ed by phrases describing
its name and the time it was begun) already
serves as the subject of the fi nal verb.
E Th e appearance of the relative pronoun as
the subject of the main verbs deprives the
term construction of a verb and makes this
sentence a fragment.
Th e correct answer is C.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-25 19:58:02 | 只看该作者
被MM欺负,还是感觉还是不错的。
If JTR was MM, I would like to be 欺负ed。。。
你的解释印证了我对这题的理解。。。thx
-- by 会员 abjure (2010/5/25 19:38:19)




怎一饥渴了得


帮贴小广告
Abjure是宽容、平和、有上进心的好男人
众有虐待趣味的MM不要错过~


纠正一个语法点:
If JTR were MM, I would like to be 欺负ed。。。


虚拟语气be一律以were代替
If I were you,……
-- by 会员 jtrchina (2010/5/25 19:46:49)



就这么点小秘密竟然被你发现,,,灭之!!!
最郁闷的是,你又教了我一个俺不会的语法点,不得再次对你说声 thanks。
7#
发表于 2010-5-25 19:46:49 | 只看该作者
被MM欺负,还是感觉还是不错的。
If JTR was MM, I would like to be 欺负ed。。。
你的解释印证了我对这题的理解。。。thx
-- by 会员 abjure (2010/5/25 19:38:19)



怎一饥渴了得


帮贴小广告
Abjure是宽容、平和、有上进心的好男人
众有虐待趣味的MM不要错过~


纠正一个语法点:
If JTR were MM, I would like to be 欺负ed。。。


虚拟语气be一律以were代替
If I were you,……
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-25 19:38:19 | 只看该作者
工具栏里有啊,笨蛋
-- by 会员 加州女孩 (2010/5/24 22:36:40)





呵呵,横向加上去了,
都和你说了,我是高度近视。。。

快点谈谈你对我的问题看法
-- by 会员 abjure (2010/5/24 22:44:03)




明明被欺负了
但Abjure却一副很陶醉的样子呢。。。


咳咳 言归正传:
who引导也有应尽量靠近修饰对象的原则,因为同为从句,都起到修饰特定对象的目的,同样也继承了会有修饰歧义的弊病
感觉复杂索性当which、that来用,引导词不同而已


110的答案非常之漂亮:
Published in Harlem, The Messenger was owned and edited by two young journalists, A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader, and Chandler Owen.
此时who明确指明修饰对象A. Philip Randolph
这种逗号+从句,引导词就近修饰的格式是否勾起了which、that的回忆呢


反观选项A
Published in Harlem, the owner and editor of The Messenger were two young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader.
who的指代修饰歧义明显:可修饰两者中的任意一者,如果没有his,甚至可以两者一起修饰


111同理,正如LS MM所述
-- by 会员 jtrchina (2010/5/25 18:50:53)



被MM欺负,还是感觉还是不错的。
If JTR was MM, I would like to be 欺负ed。。。
你的解释印证了我对这题的理解。。。thx
5#
发表于 2010-5-25 18:50:53 | 只看该作者
工具栏里有啊,笨蛋
-- by 会员 加州女孩 (2010/5/24 22:36:40)




呵呵,横向加上去了,
都和你说了,我是高度近视。。。

快点谈谈你对我的问题看法
-- by 会员 abjure (2010/5/24 22:44:03)



明明被欺负了
但Abjure却一副很陶醉的样子呢。。。


咳咳 言归正传:
who引导也有应尽量靠近修饰对象的原则,因为同为从句,都起到修饰特定对象的目的,同样也继承了会有修饰歧义的弊病
感觉复杂索性当which、that来用,引导词不同而已


110的答案非常之漂亮:
Published in Harlem, The Messenger was owned and edited by two young journalists, A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader, and Chandler Owen.
此时who明确指明修饰对象A. Philip Randolph
这种逗号+从句,引导词就近修饰的格式是否勾起了which、that的回忆呢


反观选项A
Published in Harlem, the owner and editor of The Messenger were two young journalists, Chandler Owen and A. Philip Randolph, who would later make his reputation as a labor leader.
who的指代修饰歧义明显:可修饰两者中的任意一者,如果没有his,甚至可以两者一起修饰


111同理,正如LS MM所述
地板
发表于 2010-5-24 22:45:34 | 只看该作者
。。。who是指代人啊。第二题就是指代Titus。。。还有其他人么。。。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-24 22:44:03 | 只看该作者
工具栏里有啊,笨蛋
-- by 会员 加州女孩 (2010/5/24 22:36:40)



呵呵,横向加上去了,
都和你说了,我是高度近视。。。

快点谈谈你对我的问题看法
沙发
发表于 2010-5-24 22:36:40 | 只看该作者
工具栏里有啊,笨蛋
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 10:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部