一道疑惑很久的题目~

yaoxiayi

59.    Crises in international diplomacy do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down.
(A) do not always result from malice; for nations, like individuals, can find
(B) do not always results from malice; nations, just as individuals, finding
(C) do not always results from malice; nations, such as individuals, can find
(D) aren’t always the results of malice; nations in the same way that individuals can find
(E) aren’t resulting always from malice; just like individuals who can find

答案选A，不懂哎~~后半句是句子吗？

silent7706

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:17:51)

我是这样理解的，"for" works as "because" in this case. So the sentence reads, "because nations can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down."

-- by 会员 silent7706 (2010/5/22 0:39:03)

但是如果这样理解，不是就不应该用“；”，而应该用“，”吗？ 我怎么记得“；”应该是连接两个完整句子的吗？

-- by 会员 ranshuyang (2010/5/23 9:00:40)

我也有类似的疑问。但是你看所有选项都有分号。所以只能选比较好的那个。

ranshuyang

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:17:51)

我是这样理解的，"for" works as "because" in this case. So the sentence reads, "because nations can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down."

-- by 会员 silent7706 (2010/5/22 0:39:03)

但是如果这样理解，不是就不应该用“；”，而应该用“，”吗？ 我怎么记得“；”应该是连接两个完整句子的吗？

silent7706

unable to back down没有主语和谓语诶，不是主句吧

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/22 17:16:53)

我觉得应该是修饰语, 修饰 "difficult positions"，但是不是很确定。

puqiandi

unable to back down没有主语和谓语诶，不是主句吧

silent7706

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:17:51)

我是这样理解的，"for" works as "because" in this case. So the sentence reads, "because nations can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down."

puqiandi

for nations, like individuals, can find themselves locked into difficult positions, unable to back down. 是for 引导的表示因为什么的从句的话就不是一句句子了?

silent7706

那不是半句句子吗

-- by 会员 puqiandi (2010/5/21 23:08:17)

不是，因为前面已经有了分号。分号后面只能接完整的句子如果我没有记错的话。

puqiandi

那不是半句句子吗

silent7706

for 可以表示原因。