ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1312|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教大全一题 谢

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-4-22 10:23:46 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |正序浏览 |阅读模式
1.       Legislationin the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and privateemployers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as forjobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.
(A) that pay be the same forjobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B) that pay for jobs historically held by women shouldbe the same as for a job requiringcomparable skills
(C) to pay the same in jobshistorically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D) to pay the sameregardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demandingcomparable skills
(E) to pay as much for jobshistorically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills
我想问一下E选项里的一个语法现象 jobsa job
OG里给出的解释是job does not agree in number with jobs 这个解释应该怎么理解?是理解为不平行,还是就是像它解释的那个样子只是数上不统一?
还有a job jobs不是都是泛指么?这两个是否可以平行?谢谢。
答案选A
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-22 11:08:25 | 只看该作者
这个其实是一个对比的,不能理解为平行关系,其实就和他解释的一样,a job只是一个个体,但是jobs是一个群体,两者没有可比性

另外E选项还有一个错误就是这里不能用to来表示目的;
因为前面的是requires of ...that 或者 require... to是习惯用法,但是requiires of ... to..就感觉不是那么顺口了
-- by 会员 切尔西 (2010/4/22 10:56:17)



太感谢了!明白了!
沙发
发表于 2010-4-22 10:56:17 | 只看该作者
这个其实是一个对比的,不能理解为平行关系,其实就和他解释的一样,a job只是一个个体,但是jobs是一个群体,两者没有可比性

另外E选项还有一个错误就是这里不能用to来表示目的;
因为前面的是requires of ...that 或者 require... to是习惯用法,但是requiires of ... to..就感觉不是那么顺口了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 17:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部