That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault: Alvin Toffler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970.
57. That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault : Alvin Tofler, one of the most prominent students of the future, did not even mention microcomputers in Future Shock, published in 1970. (A) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said that it is their fault (B) That educators have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said to be at fault (C) It can hardly be said that it is the fault of educators who have not anticipated the impact of microcomputer technology (D) It can hardly be said that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology (E) The fact that educators are at fault for not anticipating the impact of microcomputer technology can hardly be said 想问下B 为什么不对呢 解释说 can hardly be said to be at fault does not grammatically complete the subordinate clause
[quote] 我知道。首先排除AB,因为一句句子中出现了两个谓语。再排除E,因为the fact that很wordy。不要问为什么,这就是外国人习惯的方法,记住一点就是以后看到the fact that都别选,除非真的没得选了只能选它。再来看CD,GMAT语法宗旨之一就是语言简洁,减少阅读人思考。同时看CD选项,然后在他俩第一个不同之处停顿,C. It can hardly be said that it is the fault of.....D。It can hardly be said that educators are at fault一比较,D更直接,因为他先说出了事件的端倪。C中:that it is the fault of.中,it是什么?这要阅读人思考一下的。不要说什么这是形式主语,这只是中国人的思考方式。CDE中其实都没所谓的语法错误,可是GMAT考试要的是 prefered 的表达方式。所以D 很明确,很直接,因此选了D
你好,A,B中,我觉得是that引导的那个从句的那件事can be hardly...并不是两个谓语吧?